Skip to main content

Azure DevOps Server–Error publishing nuget packages

As part of our build process we package and push a set of nuget packages to our artifacts repository. Recently we made the switch to Azure Artifacts after which uploading packages started to fail with the following error message:

The nuget command failed with exit code(1) and error(Response status code does not indicate success: 409 (Conflict - The feed already contains ‘ExceptionHandling.Database 6.4.1'. (DevOps Activity ID: CAEC4462-2E20-4C69-9AFE-3BBC3C961E20)).)

Packages failed to publish

Ok, it seems that Azure Artifacts doesn’t like it when you try to upload the same packages multiple times. (We bumped the package version manually and didn’t care about overwriting an existing package so far). Can we fix this?

We are using the NuGet task. This task has an interesting option: ‘Allow duplicates to be skipped’. Let’s try this…

Unfortunately we ended up with the same error message as above. Let’s take a look at the documentation:

If you continually publish a set of packages and only change the version number of the subset of packages that changed, use this option. It allows the task to report success even if some of your packages are rejected with 409 Conflict errors.

This option is currently only available on Azure Pipelines and using Windows agents. If NuGet.exe encounters a conflict, the task will fail.

Aha, the last line explains everything. We are using Azure DevOps Server and it seems that this option only works in the cloud(no idea why?).

As a workaround I switched to a commandline task and invoked nuget.exe directly. If you are using a recent nuget.exe version you can add the –skipduplicate option to skip existing packages.

Labels:

Popular posts from this blog

Podman– Command execution failed with exit code 125

After updating WSL on one of the developer machines, Podman failed to work. When we took a look through Podman Desktop, we noticed that Podman had stopped running and returned the following error message: Error: Command execution failed with exit code 125 Here are the steps we tried to fix the issue: We started by running podman info to get some extra details on what could be wrong: >podman info OS: windows/amd64 provider: wsl version: 5.3.1 Cannot connect to Podman. Please verify your connection to the Linux system using `podman system connection list`, or try `podman machine init` and `podman machine start` to manage a new Linux VM Error: unable to connect to Podman socket: failed to connect: dial tcp 127.0.0.1:2655: connectex: No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it. That makes sense as the podman VM was not running. Let’s check the VM: >podman machine list NAME         ...
Read more

Cache stampede: when our cache turned against us

While investigating some performance issues, we ran into an ASP.NET Core API that cached a fairly expensive aggregation query for 60 seconds. Under normal load, that was fine: one request rebuilds the cache, everyone else reads from it. Under peak load, dozens of requests would arrive in that same expiry window, all see a cache miss, and all fire the same expensive query in parallel. The database didn't like that. That was the moment when our caching layer stopped helping and started hurting. A burst of requests comes in at the same time, all miss the cache, and all go hammer the database or the downstream API at once. That's a cache stampede . The cache was supposed to protect our backend, and for a few hundred milliseconds it did the opposite. Why this happens IMemoryCache.GetOrCreate (and its async sibling) looks like it protects you, but it doesn't add any locking on its own. Look at the naive version: public async Task<Report> GetReportAsync(string key) ...
Read more

VS Code Planning mode

After the introduction of Plan mode in Visual Studio , it now also found its way into VS Code. Planning mode, or as I like to call it 'Hannibal mode', extends GitHub Copilot's Agent Mode capabilities to handle larger, multi-step coding tasks with a structured approach. Instead of jumping straight into code generation, Planning mode creates a detailed execution plan. If you want more details, have a look at my previous post . Putting plan mode into action VS Code takes a different approach compared to Visual Studio when using plan mode. Instead of a configuration setting that you can activate but have limited control over, planning is available as a separate chat mode/agent: I like this approach better than how Visual Studio does it as you have explicit control when plan mode is activated. Instead of immediately diving into execution, the plan agent creates a plan and asks some follow up questions: You can further edit the plan by clicking on ‘Open in Editor’: ...
Read more