Skip to main content

Generate your API documentation with DocFX

After using Sandcastle for years as my default code documentation tool, I’m happy that I can finally leave Sandcastle behind and switch to a better tool; DocFX.

image

From the documentation

DocFX is an API documentation generator for .NET, currently it supports C# and VB. It has the ability to generate API reference documentation from triple slash comments of your source code. What's more, it allows you to use markdown files to create additional topics like tutorials, how-tos, or even customize the generated reference documentation. DocFX builds a static HTML web site from your source code and markdown files, which can be easily hosted on any web servers, for example, github.io. DocFX also provides you the flexibility to customize the layout and style of your web site through templates. If you are interested in creating your own web site with your own styles, you can follow how to create custom template to create custom templates.

DocFX also has the following cool features:

  • Integrated with your source code. You can click "View Source" on an API to navigate to the source code in GitHub (your source code must be pushed to GitHub).
  • Cross platform. We have both exe version that runs under Windows and a DNX version that runs cross platform.
  • Integrated with Visual Studio. DocFX can be used within Visual Studio seamlessly.
  • Markdown extensions. DocFX Flavored Markdown(DFM) is introduced to help you write API documentation. DFM is 100% compatible with Github Flavored Markdown(GFM) with some useful extensions, like file inclusion, code snippet, cross reference, and yaml header. For detailed description about DFM, please refer to DFM.

How to use it?

  • Start by downloading the DocFX executable and adding the install location to your PATH environment variable.
  • Open a command prompt and browse to the directory where you want to store the documentation
    • Call docfx init –q to generate the documentation project and configuration file

image

  • Open the docfx.json and configure the json documentation file where to search for source code(default is src subfolder).

image

  • Build the project website
    • docfx docfx_project/docfx.json

image

image

Popular posts from this blog

Podman– Command execution failed with exit code 125

After updating WSL on one of the developer machines, Podman failed to work. When we took a look through Podman Desktop, we noticed that Podman had stopped running and returned the following error message: Error: Command execution failed with exit code 125 Here are the steps we tried to fix the issue: We started by running podman info to get some extra details on what could be wrong: >podman info OS: windows/amd64 provider: wsl version: 5.3.1 Cannot connect to Podman. Please verify your connection to the Linux system using `podman system connection list`, or try `podman machine init` and `podman machine start` to manage a new Linux VM Error: unable to connect to Podman socket: failed to connect: dial tcp 127.0.0.1:2655: connectex: No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it. That makes sense as the podman VM was not running. Let’s check the VM: >podman machine list NAME         ...

Azure DevOps/ GitHub emoji

I’m really bad at remembering emoji’s. So here is cheat sheet with all emoji’s that can be used in tools that support the github emoji markdown markup: All credits go to rcaviers who created this list.

Cleaner switch expressions with pattern matching in C#

Ever find yourself mapping multiple string values to the same result? Being a C# developer for a long time, I sometimes forget that the C# has evolved so I still dare to chain case labels or reach for a dictionary. Of course with pattern matching this is no longer necessary. With pattern matching, you can express things inline, declaratively, and with zero repetition. A small example I was working on a small script that should invoke different actions depending on the environment. As our developers were using different variations for the same environment e.g.  "tst" alongside "test" , "prd" alongside "prod" .  We asked to streamline this a long time ago, but as these things happen, we still see variations in the wild. This brought me to the following code that is a perfect example for pattern matching: The or keyword here is a logical pattern combinator , not a boolean operator. It matches if either of the specified pattern...