Skip to main content

Angular 1.5 - Stateless components

Angular 1.5 brings us ‘Components’, a special kind of directive that uses a simpler configuration. It is a first step towards Angular 2.0 where directives and controllers no longer exist and are replaced by a component-based model.

Advantages and disadvantages of components

From the Angular documentation:

Advantages of Components:

  • simpler configuration than plain directives
  • promote sane defaults and best practices
  • optimized for component-based architecture
  • writing component directives will make it easier to upgrade to Angular 2

When not to use Components:

  • for directives that rely on DOM manipulation, adding event listeners etc, because the compile and link functions are unavailable
  • when you need advanced directive definition options like priority, terminal, multi-element
  • when you want a directive that is triggered by an attribute or CSS class, rather than an element

Most important to remember is that components have their own isolated state(meaning that only isolated scope is supported) and that no DOM interactions are possible.

An example

I created a small ‘PreviousNext directive’ that enable/disable previous/next buttons in a wizard. This directive uses state on a higher level wizardcontroller.

Here is the original code:

I decided to rewrite this directive to a component but to keep things simple I left most of the state in the wizardcontroller.

Here is the code rewritten as a component:

Let’s have a look at the main differences:

  • We didn’t specify a controller meaning that Angular creates one for us behind the scenes. It also creates a controllerAs value for us, $ctrl by default. So the $ctrl calls inside the template are calling a generated controller available through the $ctrl alias.
  • We used bindings to control the inputs and outputs of our component. Inputs are bound with the ‘<’  symbol and indicates a one-way binding. Output are bound with the ‘&’ symbol and function as callbacks to events. So we read out the currentStep value, call onNext, onPrevious and isLastStep functions on our generated controller that are routed to functions on the parent  (wizard)controller.

I could further improve this component by moving all the previous/next logic inside the component and call a function to feed the currentStep back to the wizardController. But this is an exercise I leave up to the reader… Smile

Popular posts from this blog

Podman– Command execution failed with exit code 125

After updating WSL on one of the developer machines, Podman failed to work. When we took a look through Podman Desktop, we noticed that Podman had stopped running and returned the following error message: Error: Command execution failed with exit code 125 Here are the steps we tried to fix the issue: We started by running podman info to get some extra details on what could be wrong: >podman info OS: windows/amd64 provider: wsl version: 5.3.1 Cannot connect to Podman. Please verify your connection to the Linux system using `podman system connection list`, or try `podman machine init` and `podman machine start` to manage a new Linux VM Error: unable to connect to Podman socket: failed to connect: dial tcp 127.0.0.1:2655: connectex: No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it. That makes sense as the podman VM was not running. Let’s check the VM: >podman machine list NAME         ...

Cache stampede: when our cache turned against us

While investigating some performance issues, we ran into an ASP.NET Core API that cached a fairly expensive aggregation query for 60 seconds. Under normal load, that was fine: one request rebuilds the cache, everyone else reads from it. Under peak load, dozens of requests would arrive in that same expiry window, all see a cache miss, and all fire the same expensive query in parallel. The database didn't like that. That was the moment when our caching layer stopped helping and started hurting. A burst of requests comes in at the same time, all miss the cache, and all go hammer the database or the downstream API at once. That's a cache stampede . The cache was supposed to protect our backend, and for a few hundred milliseconds it did the opposite. Why this happens IMemoryCache.GetOrCreate (and its async sibling) looks like it protects you, but it doesn't add any locking on its own. Look at the naive version: public async Task<Report> GetReportAsync(string key) ...

Azure DevOps/ GitHub emoji

I’m really bad at remembering emoji’s. So here is cheat sheet with all emoji’s that can be used in tools that support the github emoji markdown markup: All credits go to rcaviers who created this list.