Skip to main content

SpecFlow v2 finally arrived

We had to wait for it a long time, but now it’s finally there, a new release of SpecFlow; my favorite  Behaviour-Driven Development (BDD) tool.

So what’s new?

Important changes in SpecFlow V2 include:

  • All components upgraded to .NET 4.5.
  • Upgraded to the new Gherkin 3 parser
  • Support for parallel SpecFlow tests within the same AppDomain
  • Visual Studio integration has been separated to a separate project
  • Support for xUnit 2.0 and NUnit 3.0, including parallel test execution. The older providers have been retained and renamed (to xunit.1 and nunit.2 respectively).
  • Ability to determine the execution order of hooks (e.g. [BeforeScenario])
  • Extensible table conversions and comparisons for CreateSet, CreateInstance, CompareToSet and CompareToInstance.
  • Access the details of the currently executed step with ScenarioContext.StepContext
  • Display tags in NUnit test adapter in Visual Studio
  • Better regular expression suggestions generated for missing steps with quoted parameters
  • Steps base class provides properties for thread-safe access to feature, scenario and step contexts
  • Scenario and feature context can be injected to the binding class, avoiding static ScenarioContext.Current and FeatureContext.Current accessors
  • Better matching of column names to property names by removing characters that are invalid in property names
  • Small improvements in the DI framework
  • Easily configure SpecFlow to work with MSTest using the SpecFlow.MsTest NuGet package
  • Test execution report now includes “tags” in the NUnit report, which can be displayed using a custom XSLT
  • Removed .NET runtime version from generated file headers to avoid unwanted changes

If you never used SpecFlow before, now is a good time to try it out. Writing tests will never be the same again…

Remark: If you are already using SpecFlow today, don’t forget to check the upgrade guide: http://www.specflow.org/updating-to-specflow-2/

Labels:

Popular posts from this blog

Podman– Command execution failed with exit code 125

After updating WSL on one of the developer machines, Podman failed to work. When we took a look through Podman Desktop, we noticed that Podman had stopped running and returned the following error message: Error: Command execution failed with exit code 125 Here are the steps we tried to fix the issue: We started by running podman info to get some extra details on what could be wrong: >podman info OS: windows/amd64 provider: wsl version: 5.3.1 Cannot connect to Podman. Please verify your connection to the Linux system using `podman system connection list`, or try `podman machine init` and `podman machine start` to manage a new Linux VM Error: unable to connect to Podman socket: failed to connect: dial tcp 127.0.0.1:2655: connectex: No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it. That makes sense as the podman VM was not running. Let’s check the VM: >podman machine list NAME         ...
Read more

Azure DevOps/ GitHub emoji

I’m really bad at remembering emoji’s. So here is cheat sheet with all emoji’s that can be used in tools that support the github emoji markdown markup: All credits go to rcaviers who created this list.
Read more

Cleaner switch expressions with pattern matching in C#

Ever find yourself mapping multiple string values to the same result? Being a C# developer for a long time, I sometimes forget that the C# has evolved so I still dare to chain case labels or reach for a dictionary. Of course with pattern matching this is no longer necessary. With pattern matching, you can express things inline, declaratively, and with zero repetition. A small example I was working on a small script that should invoke different actions depending on the environment. As our developers were using different variations for the same environment e.g.  "tst" alongside "test" , "prd" alongside "prod" .  We asked to streamline this a long time ago, but as these things happen, we still see variations in the wild. This brought me to the following code that is a perfect example for pattern matching: The or keyword here is a logical pattern combinator , not a boolean operator. It matches if either of the specified pattern...
Read more