Skip to main content

System.InvalidOperationException: Dispatcher processing has been suspended, but messages are still being processed.

In a WPF application, when I try to open a specific page, the application crashes with the following error message:
“System.InvalidOperationException: Dispatcher processing has been suspended, but messages are still being processed. at System.Windows.Threading.Dispatcher.WndProcHook(IntPtr hwnd, Int32 msg, IntPtr wParam, IntPtr lParam, Boolean& handled)”
When I looked at the code, I was calling a method on my ViewModel when a specific event was triggered on my view. Inside this method I try to open a MessageBox and show a warning.
The view code:
private void SampleView_Load(object sender, EventArgs args)
{
            this
               .OnEventTrigger(grdProducts, "SizeChanged")
               .ExecuteCommand("Open1");

}

The viewmodel code:
 
public void Open1()
{
 _windowManager.OpenMessageBox("Open 1 method called.", false);
}

The ExecuteCommand() is a piece of functionality I created myself to have a fluent API to link events to commands(method call on the view model).

When I searched for more information about this exception, I found the following:

The exception is done on purpose to prevent reentrancy bugs caused by weirdness resulting from altering the visual tree, while such an event (which itself has been triggered by the visual tree altering) is firing. If you really must confirm something when the state of a UI element changes, delaying with Dispatcher.BeginInvoke is probably the right thing to do.

This code is already triggered before the form is fully loaded, and this explains why the exception happens. To solve it I changed my ExecuteCommand implementation to invoke the method on the ViewModel on the UI thread:
  

private void ExecuteCommand(Command command)
{
 if (command == null)
     return;

 Dispatcher.CurrentDispatcher.BeginInvoke(DispatcherPriority.Normal, (Action)(() => command.Execute(null)));
}

Popular posts from this blog

Azure DevOps/ GitHub emoji

I’m really bad at remembering emoji’s. So here is cheat sheet with all emoji’s that can be used in tools that support the github emoji markdown markup: All credits go to rcaviers who created this list.

Kubernetes–Limit your environmental impact

Reducing the carbon footprint and CO2 emission of our (cloud) workloads, is a responsibility of all of us. If you are running a Kubernetes cluster, have a look at Kube-Green . kube-green is a simple Kubernetes operator that automatically shuts down (some of) your pods when you don't need them. A single pod produces about 11 Kg CO2eq per year( here the calculation). Reason enough to give it a try! Installing kube-green in your cluster The easiest way to install the operator in your cluster is through kubectl. We first need to install a cert-manager: kubectl apply -f https://github.com/cert-manager/cert-manager/releases/download/v1.14.5/cert-manager.yaml Remark: Wait a minute before you continue as it can take some time before the cert-manager is up & running inside your cluster. Now we can install the kube-green operator: kubectl apply -f https://github.com/kube-green/kube-green/releases/latest/download/kube-green.yaml Now in the namespace where we want t...

Podman– Command execution failed with exit code 125

After updating WSL on one of the developer machines, Podman failed to work. When we took a look through Podman Desktop, we noticed that Podman had stopped running and returned the following error message: Error: Command execution failed with exit code 125 Here are the steps we tried to fix the issue: We started by running podman info to get some extra details on what could be wrong: >podman info OS: windows/amd64 provider: wsl version: 5.3.1 Cannot connect to Podman. Please verify your connection to the Linux system using `podman system connection list`, or try `podman machine init` and `podman machine start` to manage a new Linux VM Error: unable to connect to Podman socket: failed to connect: dial tcp 127.0.0.1:2655: connectex: No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it. That makes sense as the podman VM was not running. Let’s check the VM: >podman machine list NAME         ...