Skip to main content

Cannot convert lambda expression to type 'System.Delegate' because it is not a delegate type

Last week I was trying to pass a lambda as a parameter to a method that expected a delegate. However doing this resulted in the following compiler error

“Cannot convert lambda expression to type 'System.Delegate' because it is not a delegate type.”   

   1:  public void CreateAndExecuteLambda()
   2:  {
   3:     //Does not compile
   4:     InvokeDelegate(() => MessageBox.Show("Hello World")); 
   5:  }
   6:   
   7:  public void InvokeDelegate(Delegate @delegate) 
   8:  {
   9:     @delegate.DynamicInvoke();
  10:   }

At first I found this very strange, if I remembered it well a lambda expression is just a new syntax for anonymous methods and anonymous methods are nothing more than inline delegates. So why the compiler does not agree?

The reason is that a lambda expression can either be converted to a delegate type or an expression tree - but it has to know which delegate type. Just knowing the signature isn't enough. For instance, suppose I have:

   1:  public delegate void Action1();
   2:  public delegate void Action2();   
   3:   
   4:  Delegate x = () => Console.WriteLine("hello world"); 

What would you expect the concrete type of the object referred to by x to be?

If you want to make it work you have to help the compiler by explicitly casting the lambda expression to the correct delegate type.

   1:  public void CreateAndExecuteLambda()
   2:  {
   3:     //This works!
   4:     InvokeDelegate((Action)(() => MessageBox.Show("Hello World"))); 
   5:   }
   6:   
   7:  public void InvokeDelegate(Delegate @delegate)
   8:  {
   9:     @delegate.DynamicInvoke();
  10:  }

Popular posts from this blog

.NET 8–Keyed/Named Services

A feature that a lot of IoC container libraries support but that was missing in the default DI container provided by Microsoft is the support for Keyed or Named Services. This feature allows you to register the same type multiple times using different names, allowing you to resolve a specific instance based on the circumstances. Although there is some controversy if supporting this feature is a good idea or not, it certainly can be handy. To support this feature a new interface IKeyedServiceProvider got introduced in .NET 8 providing 2 new methods on our ServiceProvider instance: object? GetKeyedService(Type serviceType, object? serviceKey); object GetRequiredKeyedService(Type serviceType, object? serviceKey); To use it, we need to register our service using one of the new extension methods: Resolving the service can be done either through the FromKeyedServices attribute: or by injecting the IKeyedServiceProvider interface and calling the GetRequiredKeyedServic...

Azure DevOps/ GitHub emoji

I’m really bad at remembering emoji’s. So here is cheat sheet with all emoji’s that can be used in tools that support the github emoji markdown markup: All credits go to rcaviers who created this list.

Kubernetes–Limit your environmental impact

Reducing the carbon footprint and CO2 emission of our (cloud) workloads, is a responsibility of all of us. If you are running a Kubernetes cluster, have a look at Kube-Green . kube-green is a simple Kubernetes operator that automatically shuts down (some of) your pods when you don't need them. A single pod produces about 11 Kg CO2eq per year( here the calculation). Reason enough to give it a try! Installing kube-green in your cluster The easiest way to install the operator in your cluster is through kubectl. We first need to install a cert-manager: kubectl apply -f https://github.com/cert-manager/cert-manager/releases/download/v1.14.5/cert-manager.yaml Remark: Wait a minute before you continue as it can take some time before the cert-manager is up & running inside your cluster. Now we can install the kube-green operator: kubectl apply -f https://github.com/kube-green/kube-green/releases/latest/download/kube-green.yaml Now in the namespace where we want t...