Skip to main content

Using the AsyncController in ASP.NET MVC 2

On the Web server, the .NET Framework maintains a pool of threads that are used to service ASP.NET requests. When a request arrives, a thread from the pool is dispatched to process that request. If the request is processed synchronously, the thread that processes the request is blocked while the request is being processed, and that thread cannot service another request.

If you have multiple long-running requests, all available threads might be blocked and the Web server rejects any additional request with an HTTP 503 status (Server Too Busy).

To solve this issue in ASP.NET MVC, actions can be processed asynchronously by deriving your controllers from the AsyncController class.

For example, let’s convert this code sample into a more efficient asynchronous alternative:

   1:  public class HomeController: Controller 
   2:  {
   3:      public ActionResult LongRunningAction() 
   4:      {
   5:          DoLengthyOperation();
   6:          return View();
   7:      }
   8:   
   9:      private void DoLengthyOperation()
  10:      {
  11:          Thread.Sleep(5000);
  12:      }
  13:   
  14:  }

To convert this synchronous action method to an asynchronous action method involves the following steps:


  1. Instead of deriving the controller from Controller, derive it from AsyncController. Controllers that derive from AsyncController enable ASP.NET to process asynchronous requests, and they can still service synchronous action methods.


  2. Create two methods for the action. The method that initiates the asynchronous process must have a name that consists of the action and the suffix "Async". The method that is invoked when the asynchronous process finishes (the callback method) must have a name that consists of the action and the suffix "Completed". In the previous example, the LongRunningAction method has been turned into two methods: LongRunningActionAsync and LongRunningActionCompleted.

    The LongRunningActionAsync method returns void. The LongRunningActionCompleted method returns an ActionResult instance. Although the action consists of two methods, it is accessed using the same URL as for a synchronous action method (for example, Home/LongRunningAction). Methods such as RedirectToAction and RenderAction will also refer to the action method as LongRunningAction and not LongRunningActionAsync.

    The parameters that are passed to LongRunningActionAsync use the normal parameter binding mechanisms. The parameters that are passed to LongRunningActionCompleted use the Parameters dictionary.


  3. Replace the synchronous call in the original ActionResult method with an asynchronous call in the asynchronous action method.

   1:  public class HomeController : AsyncController 
   2:  {
   3:      public void LongRunningActionAsync() 
   4:      {
   5:          AsyncManager.OutstandingOperations.Increment();
   6:          Task.Factory.StartNew(() => DoLengthyOperation());
   7:      }
   8:   
   9:      private void DoLengthyOperation()
  10:      {
  11:          Thread.Sleep(5000);
  12:          AsyncManager.Parameters["message"] = "hello world";
  13:          AsyncManager.OutstandingOperations.Decrement();
  14:      }
  15:   
  16:   
  17:      public ActionResult LongRunningActionCompleted(string message) 
  18:      {
  19:          return View();
  20:      }
  21:  }

More information here.

Popular posts from this blog

Podman– Command execution failed with exit code 125

After updating WSL on one of the developer machines, Podman failed to work. When we took a look through Podman Desktop, we noticed that Podman had stopped running and returned the following error message: Error: Command execution failed with exit code 125 Here are the steps we tried to fix the issue: We started by running podman info to get some extra details on what could be wrong: >podman info OS: windows/amd64 provider: wsl version: 5.3.1 Cannot connect to Podman. Please verify your connection to the Linux system using `podman system connection list`, or try `podman machine init` and `podman machine start` to manage a new Linux VM Error: unable to connect to Podman socket: failed to connect: dial tcp 127.0.0.1:2655: connectex: No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it. That makes sense as the podman VM was not running. Let’s check the VM: >podman machine list NAME         ...

Azure DevOps/ GitHub emoji

I’m really bad at remembering emoji’s. So here is cheat sheet with all emoji’s that can be used in tools that support the github emoji markdown markup: All credits go to rcaviers who created this list.

VS Code Planning mode

After the introduction of Plan mode in Visual Studio , it now also found its way into VS Code. Planning mode, or as I like to call it 'Hannibal mode', extends GitHub Copilot's Agent Mode capabilities to handle larger, multi-step coding tasks with a structured approach. Instead of jumping straight into code generation, Planning mode creates a detailed execution plan. If you want more details, have a look at my previous post . Putting plan mode into action VS Code takes a different approach compared to Visual Studio when using plan mode. Instead of a configuration setting that you can activate but have limited control over, planning is available as a separate chat mode/agent: I like this approach better than how Visual Studio does it as you have explicit control when plan mode is activated. Instead of immediately diving into execution, the plan agent creates a plan and asks some follow up questions: You can further edit the plan by clicking on ‘Open in Editor’: ...