Skip to main content

Sending Email with System.Net.Mail

Sending mails using the .NET’s SmtpClient API is very easy and straightforward. Alas the same doesn’t count for mocking the client in your unit test. So most of the time I create an extra layer of abstraction and wrap the SmtpClient in an IEmailService.  And this works fine for my unit tests.

But for my integration tests I follow a different strategy. By default, the SmtpClient takes mail server settings from your web.config or app.config file.

To configure it to send e-mail through a particular SMTP server, add the following to your web.config file:

   1:  <configuration>
   2:     <system.net>
   3:        <mailSettings>
   4:           <smtp deliveryMethod="Network">
   5:              <network host="smtp.example.com"/>
   6:           </smtp>
   7:        </mailSettings>
   8:     </system.net>
   9:  </configuration>

But this means that an actual mail server has to be configured to run my integration tests and even worse that some test mails will be send out to everyone.

Instead it would be better if you could write mails to a local directory, so you can see what’s happening without having to set up an actual mail server. This is done very easily, change your  config to use these settings:

   1:  <configuration>
   2:     <system.net>
   3:        <mailSettings>
   4:           <smtp deliveryMethod="SpecifiedPickupDirectory">
   5:              <specifiedPickupDirectory pickupDirectoryLocation="c:\emails" />
   6:           </smtp>
   7:        </mailSettings>
   8:     </system.net>
   9:  </configuration>
  10:   

This will write .eml files to the specified folder, which must already exist and be writable. If you double-click .eml files in Windows Explorer, they’ll open in Outlook Express or Windows Mail.

Popular posts from this blog

Podman– Command execution failed with exit code 125

After updating WSL on one of the developer machines, Podman failed to work. When we took a look through Podman Desktop, we noticed that Podman had stopped running and returned the following error message: Error: Command execution failed with exit code 125 Here are the steps we tried to fix the issue: We started by running podman info to get some extra details on what could be wrong: >podman info OS: windows/amd64 provider: wsl version: 5.3.1 Cannot connect to Podman. Please verify your connection to the Linux system using `podman system connection list`, or try `podman machine init` and `podman machine start` to manage a new Linux VM Error: unable to connect to Podman socket: failed to connect: dial tcp 127.0.0.1:2655: connectex: No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it. That makes sense as the podman VM was not running. Let’s check the VM: >podman machine list NAME         ...

Azure DevOps/ GitHub emoji

I’m really bad at remembering emoji’s. So here is cheat sheet with all emoji’s that can be used in tools that support the github emoji markdown markup: All credits go to rcaviers who created this list.

VS Code Planning mode

After the introduction of Plan mode in Visual Studio , it now also found its way into VS Code. Planning mode, or as I like to call it 'Hannibal mode', extends GitHub Copilot's Agent Mode capabilities to handle larger, multi-step coding tasks with a structured approach. Instead of jumping straight into code generation, Planning mode creates a detailed execution plan. If you want more details, have a look at my previous post . Putting plan mode into action VS Code takes a different approach compared to Visual Studio when using plan mode. Instead of a configuration setting that you can activate but have limited control over, planning is available as a separate chat mode/agent: I like this approach better than how Visual Studio does it as you have explicit control when plan mode is activated. Instead of immediately diving into execution, the plan agent creates a plan and asks some follow up questions: You can further edit the plan by clicking on ‘Open in Editor’: ...