Skip to main content

Azure Pipelines–Failed to set a git tag

I mostly use the built-in functionality to set a tag on a specific commit after a successful release. However, in this case I was contacted by a colleague who was using the Git Tag task.

Unfortunately, he couldn’t get the task working. A look at the build log made it obvious what the problem was:

Starting: GitTag

==============================================================================

Task         : Git Tag

Description  : A simple task that tags a commit

Version      : 7.0.0

Author       : ATP P&I IT

Help         : tags the current commit with a specified tag. ### Prerequisites * Repository must be VSTS Git. * Allow scripts to access Oauth must be **Enabled** * Project Collection Build Service must have **Contribute** & **Create Tag** set to **Allow** or **Inherit Allow** for that particular repository

==============================================================================

Current commit is 6b28989d56aff87d2a555f5cfe94560398c7710e

##[error]OAuth token not found. Make sure to have 'Allow Scripts to Access OAuth Token' enabled in the build or release definition.

Also, give 'Project Collection Build Service' 'Contribute' and 'Create Tag' permissions - Cog -> Version Control -> {Select Repository/ies}

Finishing: GitTag

Before the task could interact with our Git repo in Azure DevOps it needs to have the necessary credentials. Therefore, it should have access to an OAuth token. This OAuth token is not available by default and should be explicitly enabled in the pipeline:

  • Click on the Phase that contains the GitTag task
  • Scroll down to the Additional Options and check the box next to ‘’Allow scripts to access the OAuth token”.

That’s it!

Remark: Don’t forget that you have a built-in alternative that could be a good fit in most cases.

More information

Azure DevOps–Set git tag on build

Git Tag - Visual Studio Marketplace

Popular posts from this blog

Kubernetes–Limit your environmental impact

Reducing the carbon footprint and CO2 emission of our (cloud) workloads, is a responsibility of all of us. If you are running a Kubernetes cluster, have a look at Kube-Green . kube-green is a simple Kubernetes operator that automatically shuts down (some of) your pods when you don't need them. A single pod produces about 11 Kg CO2eq per year( here the calculation). Reason enough to give it a try! Installing kube-green in your cluster The easiest way to install the operator in your cluster is through kubectl. We first need to install a cert-manager: kubectl apply -f https://github.com/cert-manager/cert-manager/releases/download/v1.14.5/cert-manager.yaml Remark: Wait a minute before you continue as it can take some time before the cert-manager is up & running inside your cluster. Now we can install the kube-green operator: kubectl apply -f https://github.com/kube-green/kube-green/releases/latest/download/kube-green.yaml Now in the namespace where we want t...

Azure DevOps/ GitHub emoji

I’m really bad at remembering emoji’s. So here is cheat sheet with all emoji’s that can be used in tools that support the github emoji markdown markup: All credits go to rcaviers who created this list.

Podman– Command execution failed with exit code 125

After updating WSL on one of the developer machines, Podman failed to work. When we took a look through Podman Desktop, we noticed that Podman had stopped running and returned the following error message: Error: Command execution failed with exit code 125 Here are the steps we tried to fix the issue: We started by running podman info to get some extra details on what could be wrong: >podman info OS: windows/amd64 provider: wsl version: 5.3.1 Cannot connect to Podman. Please verify your connection to the Linux system using `podman system connection list`, or try `podman machine init` and `podman machine start` to manage a new Linux VM Error: unable to connect to Podman socket: failed to connect: dial tcp 127.0.0.1:2655: connectex: No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it. That makes sense as the podman VM was not running. Let’s check the VM: >podman machine list NAME         ...