Skip to main content

Replacing EventCounters with the new Metrics API

If you've been using EventCounters for instrumenting your .NET applications, it's time to consider migrating to the newer System.Diagnostics.Metrics API. Based on the OpenTelemetry specification, the Metrics API offers a more modern, flexible, and standardized approach to application instrumentation.

Why migrate?

The Metrics API provides several advantages over EventCounters:

  • Industry Standard: Built on OpenTelemetry, ensuring compatibility with a wide ecosystem of monitoring tools
  • Better Performance: More efficient with lower overhead
  • Richer Functionality: Support for histograms, exemplars, and more sophisticated metric types
  • Improved API Design: Cleaner, more intuitive interface for defining and recording metrics
  • Better Tooling Support: Growing ecosystem support from APM vendors and monitoring solutions

Microsoft has indicated that EventCounters are in maintenance mode, with new development focused on the Metrics API.

So reasons enough to migrate our EventCounters to the new Metrics API. Let's go for it!

Our original EventCounters example

With EventCounters, you typically created an EventSource and used specialized counter types:

Migration guide

Step 1: Add the required package

While System.Diagnostics.Metrics is part of .NET 6+, you may want to add OpenTelemetry packages for collection:

dotnet add package OpenTelemetry.Exporter.Console
dotnet add package OpenTelemetry.Extensions.Hosting

Step 2: Create a meter

Replace your EventSource with a Meter. The meter name should follow reverse domain name notation:

Step 3: Map counter types

Here's how EventCounter types map to Metrics API instruments:

Event Counter type Metrics API equivalent Use case
Event Counter Counter<T> Monotonically increasing values (requests, errors)
PollingCounter ObservableGauge<T> Current value snapshots (queue length, active connections)
IncrementingEventCounter Counter<T> Cumulative totals
IncrementingPollingCounter ObservableCounter<T> Cumulative totals from callbacks

Step 4: Migrate counter definitions

Now we move the different event counter types over:

Step 5(optional): Add tags

One powerful feature of the Metrics API is built-in support for tags. This allows you to give extra context to a metric:

Remark: You can further improve the performance of tags by using the built-in source generators.

Step 6: Configure ServiceCollection

In your application startup inside  Program.cs for ASP.NET Core add the following configuration:

Final result

Here is how the complete class looks like after the migration:

More information

Source-generated metrics with strongly-typed tags - .NET | Microsoft Learn

Understanding different metric APIs - .NET | Microsoft Learn

Popular posts from this blog

Podman– Command execution failed with exit code 125

After updating WSL on one of the developer machines, Podman failed to work. When we took a look through Podman Desktop, we noticed that Podman had stopped running and returned the following error message: Error: Command execution failed with exit code 125 Here are the steps we tried to fix the issue: We started by running podman info to get some extra details on what could be wrong: >podman info OS: windows/amd64 provider: wsl version: 5.3.1 Cannot connect to Podman. Please verify your connection to the Linux system using `podman system connection list`, or try `podman machine init` and `podman machine start` to manage a new Linux VM Error: unable to connect to Podman socket: failed to connect: dial tcp 127.0.0.1:2655: connectex: No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it. That makes sense as the podman VM was not running. Let’s check the VM: >podman machine list NAME         ...

Cache stampede: when our cache turned against us

While investigating some performance issues, we ran into an ASP.NET Core API that cached a fairly expensive aggregation query for 60 seconds. Under normal load, that was fine: one request rebuilds the cache, everyone else reads from it. Under peak load, dozens of requests would arrive in that same expiry window, all see a cache miss, and all fire the same expensive query in parallel. The database didn't like that. That was the moment when our caching layer stopped helping and started hurting. A burst of requests comes in at the same time, all miss the cache, and all go hammer the database or the downstream API at once. That's a cache stampede . The cache was supposed to protect our backend, and for a few hundred milliseconds it did the opposite. Why this happens IMemoryCache.GetOrCreate (and its async sibling) looks like it protects you, but it doesn't add any locking on its own. Look at the naive version: public async Task<Report> GetReportAsync(string key) ...

A complex system designed from scratch never works

A few years ago, I worked as an architect on a big mainframe rewrite. I still count it as one of my failures. Not because the technology was wrong, but because I couldn't convince the management team to simplify the approach. Years later, the organization is still struggling to get the new system up and running. I left the project at the time, because I couldn't put my name behind an approach that would take very long and cost a lot of money without a working system to show for it along the way. Gall’s Law That memory keeps coming back to me, because it's a textbook case of Gall's Law playing out in real life. Gall's Law , from John Gall's Systemantics , states it plainly: A complex system that works is invariably found to have evolved from a simple system that worked. A complex system designed from scratch never works, and it cannot be patched to make it work. You have to start over with a simple system that works. What does that mean in practice,...