Skip to main content

Migrating from XUnit v2 to v3–Troubleshooting

The XUnit team decided to do a major overhaul of the XUnit libraries and created completely new V3 packages. So don't expect backwards compatibility but a significant architectural shift that brings improved performance, better isolation, and modernized APIs to .NET testing. While the migration requires some work, the benefits should make it worthwhile for most projects.

In this post I’ll share some of the migration problems I encountered and how to fix them.

XUnit.Abstractions is not recognized

This is an easy one. The XUnit.Abstractions has become an internal namespace and should no longer be referenced. Just remove any

using Xunit.Abstractions

statement from you code.

No v3 version of Serilog.Sinks.XUnit

After switching to the v3 version of the Xunit packages, I noticed that the old XUnit v2 version was still used somewhere causing the following compiler error:

The type 'FactAttribute' exists in both 'xunit.core, Version=2.4.2.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=8d05b1bb7a6fdb6c' and 'xunit.v3.core, Version=3.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=8d05b1bb7a6fdb6c'

The root cause turned out to be the Serilog.Sinks.XUnit NuGet package which doesn’t support xUnit.v3 yet at the moment of writing this post.

I fixed it by creating my own fork and compiling a new version of this NuGet package using xUnit.v3.

Bye, bye [UseCultureAttribute]

Before xUnit v3 I had to create my own [UseCultureAttribute] to use a different culture than the default culture to run my tests. Starting from v3, we can override the culture using either a command line switch or through our xunit.runner.json configuration file:

IAsyncLifetime changes

IAsyncLifetime now inherits from IAsyncDisposable, and the disposal behavior has changed:

Remark: Also notice the use of ValueTask instead of Task

Cancellation token warning

This last one isn’t really a show stopper (unless you have Treat warnings as errors active like me) but still useful to apply.

xUnit1051: Calls to methods which accept CancellationToken should use TestContext.Current.CancellationToken to allow test cancellation to be more responsive.

Remark: I noticed that you also have the option to inject an ITestContextAccessor instance as described here: https://anthonysimmon.com/xunit-cancellationtoken-support/

More about this new TestContext class can be found here: What's New in v3?

Labels:

Popular posts from this blog

Podman– Command execution failed with exit code 125

After updating WSL on one of the developer machines, Podman failed to work. When we took a look through Podman Desktop, we noticed that Podman had stopped running and returned the following error message: Error: Command execution failed with exit code 125 Here are the steps we tried to fix the issue: We started by running podman info to get some extra details on what could be wrong: >podman info OS: windows/amd64 provider: wsl version: 5.3.1 Cannot connect to Podman. Please verify your connection to the Linux system using `podman system connection list`, or try `podman machine init` and `podman machine start` to manage a new Linux VM Error: unable to connect to Podman socket: failed to connect: dial tcp 127.0.0.1:2655: connectex: No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it. That makes sense as the podman VM was not running. Let’s check the VM: >podman machine list NAME         ...
Read more

Cache stampede: when our cache turned against us

While investigating some performance issues, we ran into an ASP.NET Core API that cached a fairly expensive aggregation query for 60 seconds. Under normal load, that was fine: one request rebuilds the cache, everyone else reads from it. Under peak load, dozens of requests would arrive in that same expiry window, all see a cache miss, and all fire the same expensive query in parallel. The database didn't like that. That was the moment when our caching layer stopped helping and started hurting. A burst of requests comes in at the same time, all miss the cache, and all go hammer the database or the downstream API at once. That's a cache stampede . The cache was supposed to protect our backend, and for a few hundred milliseconds it did the opposite. Why this happens IMemoryCache.GetOrCreate (and its async sibling) looks like it protects you, but it doesn't add any locking on its own. Look at the naive version: public async Task<Report> GetReportAsync(string key) ...
Read more

The role of ActivitySource in OpenTelemetry for .NET

While doing some pair programming to integrate OpenTelemetry tracing to a .NET application, we had a discussion on how to use the ActivitySource . It looks simple. You new one up, give it a name, start an activity, done. The discussion started when we added a second ActivitySource with the exact same name in a different class. This made us wonder: "Are we duplicating traces now? Is this a memory leak? Do we need a singleton?" So we decided to dig deeper. This post is what we learned… What ActivitySource actually is ActivitySource is part of System.Diagnostics , not part of the OpenTelemetry NuGet packages. Microsoft built tracing primitives directly into the BCL, and OpenTelemetry's .NET SDK simply listens to them. This is why you can add distributed tracing to a library without taking a dependency on OpenTelemetry at all. An ActivitySource is a factory for Activity objects, and an Activity is .NET's name for what OpenTelemetry calls a span.(don’t ask m...
Read more