Skip to main content

Impersonation in ASP.NET Core

A colleague reached out to me with a specific scenario he had to tackle. He had an IIS hosted ASP.NET Core application using Windows Authentication where he had to execute a specific action on behalf of the current user. The typical way to do this is through impersonation. In this post I’ll explain what impersonation is and how you can get this working in ASP.NET Core.

What is impersonation?

Impersonation is a security feature that allows an application to execute code under the context of a different user identity. This capability is often used when an application needs to access resources, such as files, databases, or network services, with permissions different from those of the current user or the application's process.

By using impersonation the application temporarily assumes the identity of another user to perform specific actions, reverting back to its original identity afterward.

Some common use cases for impersonation are:

  • Accessing network shares or file systems with restricted permissions.
  • Performing administrative tasks that require elevated privileges.

  • Connecting to databases using Windows Authentication.

Impersonation in ASP.NET Core

In classic ASP.NET, impersonation could be enabled through the web.config file. However, ASP.NET Core does not support this configuration-based impersonation. Instead, impersonation must be handled programmatically using the use WindowsIdentity.RunImpersonated or RunImpersonatedAsync.

Here’s a basic example demonstrating how to implement impersonation in an ASP.NET Core application:

Remark: In the example above we are using middleware to run our impersonated code but you can also use an action filter if you want(Let me know if I should add an example).

Make sure that when trying the code above that you have the following configuration set in IIS:

  • Enable Windows Authentication in IIS Manager.

  • Disable Anonymous Authentication if not required.

  • Ensure the application pool identity has the necessary permissions for delegation if needed.

More information

Configure Windows Authentication in ASP.NET Core | Microsoft Learn

Popular posts from this blog

Podman– Command execution failed with exit code 125

After updating WSL on one of the developer machines, Podman failed to work. When we took a look through Podman Desktop, we noticed that Podman had stopped running and returned the following error message: Error: Command execution failed with exit code 125 Here are the steps we tried to fix the issue: We started by running podman info to get some extra details on what could be wrong: >podman info OS: windows/amd64 provider: wsl version: 5.3.1 Cannot connect to Podman. Please verify your connection to the Linux system using `podman system connection list`, or try `podman machine init` and `podman machine start` to manage a new Linux VM Error: unable to connect to Podman socket: failed to connect: dial tcp 127.0.0.1:2655: connectex: No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it. That makes sense as the podman VM was not running. Let’s check the VM: >podman machine list NAME         ...

Cache stampede: when our cache turned against us

While investigating some performance issues, we ran into an ASP.NET Core API that cached a fairly expensive aggregation query for 60 seconds. Under normal load, that was fine: one request rebuilds the cache, everyone else reads from it. Under peak load, dozens of requests would arrive in that same expiry window, all see a cache miss, and all fire the same expensive query in parallel. The database didn't like that. That was the moment when our caching layer stopped helping and started hurting. A burst of requests comes in at the same time, all miss the cache, and all go hammer the database or the downstream API at once. That's a cache stampede . The cache was supposed to protect our backend, and for a few hundred milliseconds it did the opposite. Why this happens IMemoryCache.GetOrCreate (and its async sibling) looks like it protects you, but it doesn't add any locking on its own. Look at the naive version: public async Task<Report> GetReportAsync(string key) ...

A complex system designed from scratch never works

A few years ago, I worked as an architect on a big mainframe rewrite. I still count it as one of my failures. Not because the technology was wrong, but because I couldn't convince the management team to simplify the approach. Years later, the organization is still struggling to get the new system up and running. I left the project at the time, because I couldn't put my name behind an approach that would take very long and cost a lot of money without a working system to show for it along the way. Gall’s Law That memory keeps coming back to me, because it's a textbook case of Gall's Law playing out in real life. Gall's Law , from John Gall's Systemantics , states it plainly: A complex system that works is invariably found to have evolved from a simple system that worked. A complex system designed from scratch never works, and it cannot be patched to make it work. You have to start over with a simple system that works. What does that mean in practice,...