Skip to main content

Improve the security of your GraphQL API’s - Part 1 - Complexity budget

As a GraphQL API gives you a lot of extra power and possibilities, it also introduces some new attack vectors.

For example, you have build some client applications consuming your GraphQL API. These applications are using a range of queries that you carefully created to implement the client functionality. These queries are well tested, optimized and don't stretch your datasource too much.

But nothing prevents the user of your (web) application to open the developer console and start creating and sending other queries to your GraphQL backend. By using the authentication token already available, he/she can call your API. So without further mitigations a user can create and run any query he/she can think of.

Luckily there are multiple ways to control this attack vector. In this blog series I want to share some ways on how you can improve the security of your GraphQL API's. In first post I'll focus on the concept of a complexity budget.

A single GraphQL query can potentially generate huge workload for a server, like thousands of database operations which can be used to cause DDoS attacks. By assigning a "cost" per field and then analyze the AST we can estimate the total cost of the GraphQL query. If this cost exceeds the complexity budget we have given to a user, the query is not executed.

Let me further explain this with an example. In HotChocolate the default cost of every field is 1. By using the custom @cost directive we can change this to any value we want.

If we now execute the following query, the total query cost is 17:

Field Cost
books     10
  title   1
  author 5
    name 1

In the example above, the cost calculation is done by static analysis. But sometimes the cost calculation is more dynamic. For example what if we decide to fetch a 100 items instead of the default 10?

To handle this scenario we can configure a multiplier:

As you can see we are using the take argument as a multiplier.

Limit the operational complexity

Now that we have explained the concept, let’s apply it in practice.

I typically use the code first syntax. There we could set the cost through the Cost function:

Now to limit the complexity we have to update our GraphQL configuration:

Log the operational complexity

To monitor the operational complexity, you can tweak the OpenTelemetry integration and include the AnalyzeComplexity scope:

Popular posts from this blog

Podman– Command execution failed with exit code 125

After updating WSL on one of the developer machines, Podman failed to work. When we took a look through Podman Desktop, we noticed that Podman had stopped running and returned the following error message: Error: Command execution failed with exit code 125 Here are the steps we tried to fix the issue: We started by running podman info to get some extra details on what could be wrong: >podman info OS: windows/amd64 provider: wsl version: 5.3.1 Cannot connect to Podman. Please verify your connection to the Linux system using `podman system connection list`, or try `podman machine init` and `podman machine start` to manage a new Linux VM Error: unable to connect to Podman socket: failed to connect: dial tcp 127.0.0.1:2655: connectex: No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it. That makes sense as the podman VM was not running. Let’s check the VM: >podman machine list NAME         ...

Azure DevOps/ GitHub emoji

I’m really bad at remembering emoji’s. So here is cheat sheet with all emoji’s that can be used in tools that support the github emoji markdown markup: All credits go to rcaviers who created this list.

VS Code Planning mode

After the introduction of Plan mode in Visual Studio , it now also found its way into VS Code. Planning mode, or as I like to call it 'Hannibal mode', extends GitHub Copilot's Agent Mode capabilities to handle larger, multi-step coding tasks with a structured approach. Instead of jumping straight into code generation, Planning mode creates a detailed execution plan. If you want more details, have a look at my previous post . Putting plan mode into action VS Code takes a different approach compared to Visual Studio when using plan mode. Instead of a configuration setting that you can activate but have limited control over, planning is available as a separate chat mode/agent: I like this approach better than how Visual Studio does it as you have explicit control when plan mode is activated. Instead of immediately diving into execution, the plan agent creates a plan and asks some follow up questions: You can further edit the plan by clicking on ‘Open in Editor’: ...