Skip to main content

Comments are a design tool

One of the controversial topics among developers is about writing code comments. I see a lot of developers no longer writing any kind of comments inside their codebase (with the exception of ‘TODO’ comments that can be found in almost every codebase).

Side note: If any comments are found in the codebase they are typically generated afterwards, and I think with the introduction of AI in the developers toolbox, this will not get any better. These type of comments don’t add a lot value as they just emphasize the obvious and repeat the information already found in the code.

When I ask developers why they don’t write any comments, the typically answer is

Code should be self-explaining.

And although I agree with the statement above not all information about the code could be expressed through the code alone.

Another excuse I hear a lot is that developers see it as a code smell because code that needs comments is probably badly written and could be refactored to something more readable and expressive.

Comments are not an excuse for sloppy code.

I think that writing comments is really important (and similar to start writing a test before the implementation when using TDD) I always start with writing comments. Doing this improves the system design as it forces me to think first and code later. To write a good comment, you must identify the essence of a variable or piece of code: what are the most important aspects of this thing? It’s important to do this early in the design process; otherwise you are just hacking code.

The act of writing comments allows you to evaluate your design decisions, so you can discover and fix problems early in the process.

Popular posts from this blog

Podman– Command execution failed with exit code 125

After updating WSL on one of the developer machines, Podman failed to work. When we took a look through Podman Desktop, we noticed that Podman had stopped running and returned the following error message: Error: Command execution failed with exit code 125 Here are the steps we tried to fix the issue: We started by running podman info to get some extra details on what could be wrong: >podman info OS: windows/amd64 provider: wsl version: 5.3.1 Cannot connect to Podman. Please verify your connection to the Linux system using `podman system connection list`, or try `podman machine init` and `podman machine start` to manage a new Linux VM Error: unable to connect to Podman socket: failed to connect: dial tcp 127.0.0.1:2655: connectex: No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it. That makes sense as the podman VM was not running. Let’s check the VM: >podman machine list NAME         ...

Azure DevOps/ GitHub emoji

I’m really bad at remembering emoji’s. So here is cheat sheet with all emoji’s that can be used in tools that support the github emoji markdown markup: All credits go to rcaviers who created this list.

VS Code Planning mode

After the introduction of Plan mode in Visual Studio , it now also found its way into VS Code. Planning mode, or as I like to call it 'Hannibal mode', extends GitHub Copilot's Agent Mode capabilities to handle larger, multi-step coding tasks with a structured approach. Instead of jumping straight into code generation, Planning mode creates a detailed execution plan. If you want more details, have a look at my previous post . Putting plan mode into action VS Code takes a different approach compared to Visual Studio when using plan mode. Instead of a configuration setting that you can activate but have limited control over, planning is available as a separate chat mode/agent: I like this approach better than how Visual Studio does it as you have explicit control when plan mode is activated. Instead of immediately diving into execution, the plan agent creates a plan and asks some follow up questions: You can further edit the plan by clicking on ‘Open in Editor’: ...