Skip to main content

Web Deploy - error NU1201: Project is not compatible with net5.0

At one of my clients, we use Web Deploy to deploy our ASP.NET Core applications on our on-premise IIS environment.

After upgrading an application to .NET 6, the build pipeline failed and the application wasn't deployed. Let’s find out what was causing the problem.

A look at the build logs revealed the following error message:

Determining projects to restore...

D:\b\3\_work\52\s\DocumentStorage\DocumentStorage.API\DocumentStorage.API.csproj : error NU1201: Project DocumentStorage.Domain is not compatible with net5.0 (.NETCoreApp,Version=v5.0). Project DocumentStorage.Domain supports: net6.0 (.NETCoreApp,Version=v6.0)

D:\b\3\_work\52\s\DocumentStorage\DocumentStorage.API\DocumentStorage.API.csproj : error NU1201: Project DocumentStorage.Infrastructure is not compatible with net5.0 (.NETCoreApp,Version=v5.0). Project DocumentStorage.Infrastructure supports: net6.0 (.NETCoreApp,Version=v6.0)

Failed to restore D:\b\3\_work\52\s\DocumentStorage\DocumentStorage.API\DocumentStorage.API.csproj (in 636 ms).

2 of 3 projects are up-to-date for restore.

##[error]Error: The process 'C:\Program Files\dotnet\dotnet.exe' failed with exit code 1

"C:\Program Files\dotnet\dotnet.exe" publish D:\b\3\_work\52\s\DocumentStorage\DocumentStorage.Proxy\DocumentStorage.Proxy.csproj --configuration Development /p:PublishProfile=Development /p:Password=*** /p:Username=****/p:AllowUntrustedCertificate=True

Microsoft (R) Build Engine version 17.0.0+c9eb9dd64 for .NET

Copyright (C) Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.

More information about the NU1201 error message can be found here: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/nuget/reference/errors-and-warnings/nu1201

For an unknown reason, it was still thinking that this application should be deployed as a .NET5.0 application which of course is not compatible with the application dependencies that where all using .NET6.0.

So what could make the application think that it was still a .NET5.0 application?

I found the answer in the Web Deploy configuration file(*.pubxml):

Inside this file there was a <TargetFramework> section and this was still pointing to .NET5.0. After changing this to .NET6.0, the error disappeared.

Labels:

Popular posts from this blog

Azure DevOps/ GitHub emoji

I’m really bad at remembering emoji’s. So here is cheat sheet with all emoji’s that can be used in tools that support the github emoji markdown markup: All credits go to rcaviers who created this list.
Read more

Podman– Command execution failed with exit code 125

After updating WSL on one of the developer machines, Podman failed to work. When we took a look through Podman Desktop, we noticed that Podman had stopped running and returned the following error message: Error: Command execution failed with exit code 125 Here are the steps we tried to fix the issue: We started by running podman info to get some extra details on what could be wrong: >podman info OS: windows/amd64 provider: wsl version: 5.3.1 Cannot connect to Podman. Please verify your connection to the Linux system using `podman system connection list`, or try `podman machine init` and `podman machine start` to manage a new Linux VM Error: unable to connect to Podman socket: failed to connect: dial tcp 127.0.0.1:2655: connectex: No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it. That makes sense as the podman VM was not running. Let’s check the VM: >podman machine list NAME         ...
Read more

Cleaner switch expressions with pattern matching in C#

Ever find yourself mapping multiple string values to the same result? Being a C# developer for a long time, I sometimes forget that the C# has evolved so I still dare to chain case labels or reach for a dictionary. Of course with pattern matching this is no longer necessary. With pattern matching, you can express things inline, declaratively, and with zero repetition. A small example I was working on a small script that should invoke different actions depending on the environment. As our developers were using different variations for the same environment e.g.  "tst" alongside "test" , "prd" alongside "prod" .  We asked to streamline this a long time ago, but as these things happen, we still see variations in the wild. This brought me to the following code that is a perfect example for pattern matching: The or keyword here is a logical pattern combinator , not a boolean operator. It matches if either of the specified pattern...
Read more