Skip to main content

ASP.NET Core- Customize authorization responses with IAuthorizationMiddlewareResultHandler

One of my ASP.NET Core applications hosts both an API and a website. There are multiple places where authentication and authorizaton rules are checked:

  • In the Accountcontroller Login Action method
  • In a custom AuthorizationHandler
  • In a custom IAuthorizationFilter

Remark: Don’t ask me why we have all these places, that is maybe something for another blog post.

Recently I had to make a change to the application so that depending if the request was coming from the website or through the API, a different message was returned when authorization failed. I didn’t like the idea that I had to implement the same change 3 times, so I started to search for a better solution…

The solution

I found the solution in the implementation of the IAuthorizationMiddlewareResultHandler. By implementing this middleware, you can:

  • Return customized responses.
  • Enhance the default challenge or forbid responses.

That is exactly what we need!. Here is a simplified example:

Register this middleware in your ASP.NET Core Program.cs file:

Popular posts from this blog

Podman– Command execution failed with exit code 125

After updating WSL on one of the developer machines, Podman failed to work. When we took a look through Podman Desktop, we noticed that Podman had stopped running and returned the following error message: Error: Command execution failed with exit code 125 Here are the steps we tried to fix the issue: We started by running podman info to get some extra details on what could be wrong: >podman info OS: windows/amd64 provider: wsl version: 5.3.1 Cannot connect to Podman. Please verify your connection to the Linux system using `podman system connection list`, or try `podman machine init` and `podman machine start` to manage a new Linux VM Error: unable to connect to Podman socket: failed to connect: dial tcp 127.0.0.1:2655: connectex: No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it. That makes sense as the podman VM was not running. Let’s check the VM: >podman machine list NAME         ...

Azure DevOps/ GitHub emoji

I’m really bad at remembering emoji’s. So here is cheat sheet with all emoji’s that can be used in tools that support the github emoji markdown markup: All credits go to rcaviers who created this list.

VS Code Planning mode

After the introduction of Plan mode in Visual Studio , it now also found its way into VS Code. Planning mode, or as I like to call it 'Hannibal mode', extends GitHub Copilot's Agent Mode capabilities to handle larger, multi-step coding tasks with a structured approach. Instead of jumping straight into code generation, Planning mode creates a detailed execution plan. If you want more details, have a look at my previous post . Putting plan mode into action VS Code takes a different approach compared to Visual Studio when using plan mode. Instead of a configuration setting that you can activate but have limited control over, planning is available as a separate chat mode/agent: I like this approach better than how Visual Studio does it as you have explicit control when plan mode is activated. Instead of immediately diving into execution, the plan agent creates a plan and asks some follow up questions: You can further edit the plan by clicking on ‘Open in Editor’: ...