Skip to main content

Kubernetes–What is the difference between resource requests and limits?

In Kubernetes it is a best practice to configure resource limits for your containers. VSCode will even warn you if it couldn’t detect resource limits in your manifest files:

Setting resource limits prevents a container consuming too much resources and impacting other workloads. By setting limits, pods will be terminated by Kubernetes when their limits are exceeded. This helps in keeping the cluster healthy and stable.

The most common resources to specify are CPU and memory, but others exists.

Here is a short example on how to configure this at the container level:

In the example above, the CPU usage is limited to 250m or  250 milliCPU (1/4th of a vCPU/Core) and memory usage is limited to 512Mi or 512MiB.

Next to resource limits, it is also possible to configure resource requests. Setting a resource request indicates the amount of that resource that you expect the container will use. Kubernetes will use this information when determining which node to schedule the pod on.

A node will be ineligible to host a new container if the sum of the workload requests, including the new container’s request, exceeds the available capacity. This remains the case even if the real-time memory use is actually very low.  This is the reason why it is best to keep the requests values as low as possible and setting the limits as high as possible(without bringing other workloads into trouble). Using a low resource request value gives your pods the best chance of getting scheduled to a node.

Limits are also configured in the resource section of your manifest file:

More information: https://kubernetes.io/docs/concepts/configuration/manage-resources-containers/

Popular posts from this blog

Podman– Command execution failed with exit code 125

After updating WSL on one of the developer machines, Podman failed to work. When we took a look through Podman Desktop, we noticed that Podman had stopped running and returned the following error message: Error: Command execution failed with exit code 125 Here are the steps we tried to fix the issue: We started by running podman info to get some extra details on what could be wrong: >podman info OS: windows/amd64 provider: wsl version: 5.3.1 Cannot connect to Podman. Please verify your connection to the Linux system using `podman system connection list`, or try `podman machine init` and `podman machine start` to manage a new Linux VM Error: unable to connect to Podman socket: failed to connect: dial tcp 127.0.0.1:2655: connectex: No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it. That makes sense as the podman VM was not running. Let’s check the VM: >podman machine list NAME         ...

Azure DevOps/ GitHub emoji

I’m really bad at remembering emoji’s. So here is cheat sheet with all emoji’s that can be used in tools that support the github emoji markdown markup: All credits go to rcaviers who created this list.

VS Code Planning mode

After the introduction of Plan mode in Visual Studio , it now also found its way into VS Code. Planning mode, or as I like to call it 'Hannibal mode', extends GitHub Copilot's Agent Mode capabilities to handle larger, multi-step coding tasks with a structured approach. Instead of jumping straight into code generation, Planning mode creates a detailed execution plan. If you want more details, have a look at my previous post . Putting plan mode into action VS Code takes a different approach compared to Visual Studio when using plan mode. Instead of a configuration setting that you can activate but have limited control over, planning is available as a separate chat mode/agent: I like this approach better than how Visual Studio does it as you have explicit control when plan mode is activated. Instead of immediately diving into execution, the plan agent creates a plan and asks some follow up questions: You can further edit the plan by clicking on ‘Open in Editor’: ...