Skip to main content

GraphQL HotChocolate 11 - Updated Application Insights monitoring

A few months ago, I blogged about integrating Application Insights in HotChocolate to monitor the executed GraphQL queries and mutations. In HotChocolate 11, the diagnostics system has been rewritten and the code I shared in that post no longer works.  Here is finally the updated post I promised on how to achieve this in HotChocolate 11.

Creating our own DiagnosticEventListener

  • Starting from HotChocolate 11, your diagnostic class should inherit from DiagnosticEventListener. We still inject the Application Insights TelemetryClient in the constructor:

Remark: There seems to be a problem with dependency injection in HotChocolate 11. This problem was fixed in HotChocolate 12. I show you a workaround at the end of this article.

  • In this class you need to override at least the ExecuteRequest method:
  • To track the full lifetime of a request, we need to implement a class that implements the IActivityScope interface. In the constructor of this class, we put all our initialization logic:
  • I'm using 2 small helper methods GetHttpContextFrom and GetOperationIdFrom:
  • In the Dispose() method, we clean up all resources and send the telemetry data to Application Insights for this request:
  • Here we are using 1 extra helper method HandleErrors:

Here is the full code:

Configuring the DiagnosticEventListener

Before we can use this listener, we need to register it in our Startup.cs file:

Remark:Notice that we are using an overload of the AddDiagnosticEventListener method to resolve and pass the TelemetryClient instance to the listener. If you don’t use this overload, nothing gets injected and you end up with an error. As mentioned, this code only works starting from HotChocolate 12. For Hot Chocolate 11, check out the workaround below.

Workaround for HotChocolate 11

In HotChocolate 11, when you try to use the ServiceProvider instance inside the listener, you don’t get access to the application level services. This means that you cannot resolve the TelemetryClient. As a hack we can build an intermediate  ServiceProvider instance and use that instead:

Popular posts from this blog

Podman– Command execution failed with exit code 125

After updating WSL on one of the developer machines, Podman failed to work. When we took a look through Podman Desktop, we noticed that Podman had stopped running and returned the following error message: Error: Command execution failed with exit code 125 Here are the steps we tried to fix the issue: We started by running podman info to get some extra details on what could be wrong: >podman info OS: windows/amd64 provider: wsl version: 5.3.1 Cannot connect to Podman. Please verify your connection to the Linux system using `podman system connection list`, or try `podman machine init` and `podman machine start` to manage a new Linux VM Error: unable to connect to Podman socket: failed to connect: dial tcp 127.0.0.1:2655: connectex: No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it. That makes sense as the podman VM was not running. Let’s check the VM: >podman machine list NAME         ...

Azure DevOps/ GitHub emoji

I’m really bad at remembering emoji’s. So here is cheat sheet with all emoji’s that can be used in tools that support the github emoji markdown markup: All credits go to rcaviers who created this list.

VS Code Planning mode

After the introduction of Plan mode in Visual Studio , it now also found its way into VS Code. Planning mode, or as I like to call it 'Hannibal mode', extends GitHub Copilot's Agent Mode capabilities to handle larger, multi-step coding tasks with a structured approach. Instead of jumping straight into code generation, Planning mode creates a detailed execution plan. If you want more details, have a look at my previous post . Putting plan mode into action VS Code takes a different approach compared to Visual Studio when using plan mode. Instead of a configuration setting that you can activate but have limited control over, planning is available as a separate chat mode/agent: I like this approach better than how Visual Studio does it as you have explicit control when plan mode is activated. Instead of immediately diving into execution, the plan agent creates a plan and asks some follow up questions: You can further edit the plan by clicking on ‘Open in Editor’: ...