Skip to main content

WebDeploy - EnableMsDeployAppOffline

At one of my customers we are using WebDeploy for years to deploy our web applications to IIS. Although not that well documented, it works great and has good Visual Studio integration.

When reviewing the release pipeline of one of my colleagues I noticed that they introduced tasks in the release pipeline to stop the application pool before deploying the package and start the application pool again once the deployment completed.

This is probably done because ASP.NET Core applications hosted in IIS run in-place and lock the files that they are running from. So if we don’t stop the application pool, web deploy will fail as it cannot replace these files.

Although this solution works, WebDeploy has a built-in alternative; the EnableMsDeployAppOffline flag.

When set to true this flag, WebDeploy will create an app_offline.htm file which unloads the running application, publishes files, then removes that file.

Sidenote: About app_offline.htm

The app_offline.htm is a long existing feature in IIS that can be used to shut own the Application Host and start it back up but without loading any of the modules and only serving the app_offline.htm file.It is an effective way to keep your site from running and showing a ‘busy’ or ‘not available’ message instead.  As long as this file is found in the root folder of your site no code will be run. Once the file gets deleted, the site starts back up.

When using the EnableMsDeployAppOffline flag, the app_offline.htm file is created for you by WebDeploy.

To use it through msbuild you need to add the following command line argument:

/p:EnableMSDeployAppOffline=true
Or when using the WinRM – Web App Deployment tasks, you can set the Take App Offline flag:

Popular posts from this blog

Podman– Command execution failed with exit code 125

After updating WSL on one of the developer machines, Podman failed to work. When we took a look through Podman Desktop, we noticed that Podman had stopped running and returned the following error message: Error: Command execution failed with exit code 125 Here are the steps we tried to fix the issue: We started by running podman info to get some extra details on what could be wrong: >podman info OS: windows/amd64 provider: wsl version: 5.3.1 Cannot connect to Podman. Please verify your connection to the Linux system using `podman system connection list`, or try `podman machine init` and `podman machine start` to manage a new Linux VM Error: unable to connect to Podman socket: failed to connect: dial tcp 127.0.0.1:2655: connectex: No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it. That makes sense as the podman VM was not running. Let’s check the VM: >podman machine list NAME         ...

Cache stampede: when our cache turned against us

While investigating some performance issues, we ran into an ASP.NET Core API that cached a fairly expensive aggregation query for 60 seconds. Under normal load, that was fine: one request rebuilds the cache, everyone else reads from it. Under peak load, dozens of requests would arrive in that same expiry window, all see a cache miss, and all fire the same expensive query in parallel. The database didn't like that. That was the moment when our caching layer stopped helping and started hurting. A burst of requests comes in at the same time, all miss the cache, and all go hammer the database or the downstream API at once. That's a cache stampede . The cache was supposed to protect our backend, and for a few hundred milliseconds it did the opposite. Why this happens IMemoryCache.GetOrCreate (and its async sibling) looks like it protects you, but it doesn't add any locking on its own. Look at the naive version: public async Task<Report> GetReportAsync(string key) ...

The role of ActivitySource in OpenTelemetry for .NET

While doing some pair programming to integrate OpenTelemetry tracing to a .NET application, we had a discussion on how to use the ActivitySource . It looks simple. You new one up, give it a name, start an activity, done. The discussion started when we added a second ActivitySource with the exact same name in a different class. This made us wonder: "Are we duplicating traces now? Is this a memory leak? Do we need a singleton?" So we decided to dig deeper. This post is what we learned… What ActivitySource actually is ActivitySource is part of System.Diagnostics , not part of the OpenTelemetry NuGet packages. Microsoft built tracing primitives directly into the BCL, and OpenTelemetry's .NET SDK simply listens to them. This is why you can add distributed tracing to a library without taking a dependency on OpenTelemetry at all. An ActivitySource is a factory for Activity objects, and an Activity is .NET's name for what OpenTelemetry calls a span.(don’t ask m...