Skip to main content

AutoRest- Duplicate operation detected

I was trying to use AutoRest to generate a client SDK for one of my API’s. This turned out not to be the success I was hoping for.

Yesterday I explained that I got into trouble because an OperationId was missing. But after adding it, it still didn’t work. Instead I got the following error message:

Duplicate operation detected

Here was the API controller I was using:

AutoRest uses the OpenAPI generated through Swashbuckle. When I took  a look at the OpenAPI file, I noticed that indeed the same OperationId was used:

This is because I was using the ActionName as the OperationId. As I have multiple Action methods with the same name they all result in the same OperationIe

To fix it, you can do 2 things:

  • Using the [SwaggerOperation] attribute
  • Using the Name property on the Http attribute ([HttpGet], [HttpPost],…)

Using the [SwaggerOperation] attribute

By adding a [SwaggerOperation] attribute to the controller action method, you can control the generated OperationId:

Using the Name property

An alternative solution is to use the Name property on the HTTP routing attributes:

Popular posts from this blog

Podman– Command execution failed with exit code 125

After updating WSL on one of the developer machines, Podman failed to work. When we took a look through Podman Desktop, we noticed that Podman had stopped running and returned the following error message: Error: Command execution failed with exit code 125 Here are the steps we tried to fix the issue: We started by running podman info to get some extra details on what could be wrong: >podman info OS: windows/amd64 provider: wsl version: 5.3.1 Cannot connect to Podman. Please verify your connection to the Linux system using `podman system connection list`, or try `podman machine init` and `podman machine start` to manage a new Linux VM Error: unable to connect to Podman socket: failed to connect: dial tcp 127.0.0.1:2655: connectex: No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it. That makes sense as the podman VM was not running. Let’s check the VM: >podman machine list NAME         ...

Cache stampede: when our cache turned against us

While investigating some performance issues, we ran into an ASP.NET Core API that cached a fairly expensive aggregation query for 60 seconds. Under normal load, that was fine: one request rebuilds the cache, everyone else reads from it. Under peak load, dozens of requests would arrive in that same expiry window, all see a cache miss, and all fire the same expensive query in parallel. The database didn't like that. That was the moment when our caching layer stopped helping and started hurting. A burst of requests comes in at the same time, all miss the cache, and all go hammer the database or the downstream API at once. That's a cache stampede . The cache was supposed to protect our backend, and for a few hundred milliseconds it did the opposite. Why this happens IMemoryCache.GetOrCreate (and its async sibling) looks like it protects you, but it doesn't add any locking on its own. Look at the naive version: public async Task<Report> GetReportAsync(string key) ...

Azure DevOps/ GitHub emoji

I’m really bad at remembering emoji’s. So here is cheat sheet with all emoji’s that can be used in tools that support the github emoji markdown markup: All credits go to rcaviers who created this list.