Skip to main content

DDD–Strongly typed Ids

One of the core principles of DDD is the usage of value objects to avoid “primitive obsession”. "Primitives" refer to the built-in types in C#,  int, string,guid etc. "Primitive obsession" refers to over-using these types to represent domain concepts that aren't a perfect fit. Some examples are a HouseNumber that is represented by an int or an EmailAddress that is represented by a string.

This concept not only makes sense for your value objects but is also valuable for your Entity and AggregateRoot id’s. A ProductId should not be interchangeable with an OrderId.

Creating a valueobject for every Id type is not that hard but remains cumbersome. Let’s introduce StronglyTypedId as a solution.

From the website:

StronglyTypedId makes creating strongly-typed IDs as easy as adding an attribute! No more accidentally passing arguments in the wrong order to methods - StronglyTypedId uses Roslyn-powered build-time code generation to generate the boilerplate required to use strongly-typed IDs.

Getting started

  • To get started, first add the StronglyTypedId nuget package to your project: https://www.nuget.org/packages/StronglyTypedId/
  • Now create a struct type and add the StronglyTypedId attribute on it.
    • Notice that we specify to not generate a JsonConverter. If you want to serialize the type you need to add an extra reference to Newtonsoft.Json or System.Text.Json.
  • Build your project. Let’s have a look at what is generated:
  • By default a Guid is used as the backing field. If you want to use a different type, you can specify this:

Popular posts from this blog

Podman– Command execution failed with exit code 125

After updating WSL on one of the developer machines, Podman failed to work. When we took a look through Podman Desktop, we noticed that Podman had stopped running and returned the following error message: Error: Command execution failed with exit code 125 Here are the steps we tried to fix the issue: We started by running podman info to get some extra details on what could be wrong: >podman info OS: windows/amd64 provider: wsl version: 5.3.1 Cannot connect to Podman. Please verify your connection to the Linux system using `podman system connection list`, or try `podman machine init` and `podman machine start` to manage a new Linux VM Error: unable to connect to Podman socket: failed to connect: dial tcp 127.0.0.1:2655: connectex: No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it. That makes sense as the podman VM was not running. Let’s check the VM: >podman machine list NAME         ...

Azure DevOps/ GitHub emoji

I’m really bad at remembering emoji’s. So here is cheat sheet with all emoji’s that can be used in tools that support the github emoji markdown markup: All credits go to rcaviers who created this list.

Cache stampede: when our cache turned against us

While investigating some performance issues, we ran into an ASP.NET Core API that cached a fairly expensive aggregation query for 60 seconds. Under normal load, that was fine: one request rebuilds the cache, everyone else reads from it. Under peak load, dozens of requests would arrive in that same expiry window, all see a cache miss, and all fire the same expensive query in parallel. The database didn't like that. That was the moment when our caching layer stopped helping and started hurting. A burst of requests comes in at the same time, all miss the cache, and all go hammer the database or the downstream API at once. That's a cache stampede . The cache was supposed to protect our backend, and for a few hundred milliseconds it did the opposite. Why this happens IMemoryCache.GetOrCreate (and its async sibling) looks like it protects you, but it doesn't add any locking on its own. Look at the naive version: public async Task<Report> GetReportAsync(string key) ...