Skip to main content

DDD–Strongly typed Ids

One of the core principles of DDD is the usage of value objects to avoid “primitive obsession”. "Primitives" refer to the built-in types in C#,  int, string,guid etc. "Primitive obsession" refers to over-using these types to represent domain concepts that aren't a perfect fit. Some examples are a HouseNumber that is represented by an int or an EmailAddress that is represented by a string.

This concept not only makes sense for your value objects but is also valuable for your Entity and AggregateRoot id’s. A ProductId should not be interchangeable with an OrderId.

Creating a valueobject for every Id type is not that hard but remains cumbersome. Let’s introduce StronglyTypedId as a solution.

From the website:

StronglyTypedId makes creating strongly-typed IDs as easy as adding an attribute! No more accidentally passing arguments in the wrong order to methods - StronglyTypedId uses Roslyn-powered build-time code generation to generate the boilerplate required to use strongly-typed IDs.

Getting started

  • To get started, first add the StronglyTypedId nuget package to your project: https://www.nuget.org/packages/StronglyTypedId/
  • Now create a struct type and add the StronglyTypedId attribute on it.
    • Notice that we specify to not generate a JsonConverter. If you want to serialize the type you need to add an extra reference to Newtonsoft.Json or System.Text.Json.
  • Build your project. Let’s have a look at what is generated:
  • By default a Guid is used as the backing field. If you want to use a different type, you can specify this:

Popular posts from this blog

Azure DevOps/ GitHub emoji

I’m really bad at remembering emoji’s. So here is cheat sheet with all emoji’s that can be used in tools that support the github emoji markdown markup: All credits go to rcaviers who created this list.

Podman– Command execution failed with exit code 125

After updating WSL on one of the developer machines, Podman failed to work. When we took a look through Podman Desktop, we noticed that Podman had stopped running and returned the following error message: Error: Command execution failed with exit code 125 Here are the steps we tried to fix the issue: We started by running podman info to get some extra details on what could be wrong: >podman info OS: windows/amd64 provider: wsl version: 5.3.1 Cannot connect to Podman. Please verify your connection to the Linux system using `podman system connection list`, or try `podman machine init` and `podman machine start` to manage a new Linux VM Error: unable to connect to Podman socket: failed to connect: dial tcp 127.0.0.1:2655: connectex: No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it. That makes sense as the podman VM was not running. Let’s check the VM: >podman machine list NAME         ...

Cleaner switch expressions with pattern matching in C#

Ever find yourself mapping multiple string values to the same result? Being a C# developer for a long time, I sometimes forget that the C# has evolved so I still dare to chain case labels or reach for a dictionary. Of course with pattern matching this is no longer necessary. With pattern matching, you can express things inline, declaratively, and with zero repetition. A small example I was working on a small script that should invoke different actions depending on the environment. As our developers were using different variations for the same environment e.g.  "tst" alongside "test" , "prd" alongside "prod" .  We asked to streamline this a long time ago, but as these things happen, we still see variations in the wild. This brought me to the following code that is a perfect example for pattern matching: The or keyword here is a logical pattern combinator , not a boolean operator. It matches if either of the specified pattern...