Skip to main content

TFS Build Agent - SSL certificate problem: unable to get local issuer certificate

After upgrading to a new TFS server and going full HTTPS, our git based builds started to fail with the following error message:

2018-06-12T21:28:45.8463514Z ##[command]git init "D:\Builds\dev-agent-1\_work\5\s"

2018-06-12T21:28:45.9154418Z Initialized empty Git repository in D:/Builds/dev-agent-1/_work/5/s/.git/

2018-06-12T21:28:45.9219662Z ##[command]git remote add origin https://tfs/DefaultCollection/_git/Sample

2018-06-12T21:28:45.9821910Z ##[command]git config gc.auto 0

2018-06-12T21:28:46.0407163Z ##[command]git config --get-all http.https://tfs/DefaultCollection/_git/Sample.extraheader

2018-06-12T21:28:46.0994413Z ##[command]git config --get-all http.proxy

2018-06-12T21:28:46.1508406Z ##[command]git -c http.extraheader="AUTHORIZATION: bearer ********" fetch --tags --prune --progress --no-recurse-submodules origin

2018-06-12T21:28:46.3636860Z fatal: unable to access 'https://tfs/DefaultCollection/_git/Sample/': SSL certificate problem: unable to get local issuer certificate

2018-06-12T21:28:46.3988694Z ##[error]Git fetch failed with exit code: 128

2018-06-12T21:28:46.4040002Z ##[section]Finishing: Get Sources

The SSL certificate we are using is based on a corporate root certificate. This root certificate is stored in the certificate store on all the servers .Any application written to use the Windows crypto APIs will have access to that root certificate, and will consider your TFS deployment to be trusted.

Unfortunately, Git for Windows (git.exe) uses OpenSSL for its crypto stack, and the Git for Windows distribution includes a set of trusted root certificates in a simple text file. As our root certificate is not in this set, we’ll get the error above.

An easy workaround we used at first was to add the following configuration setting on the global git config available at c:\programdata\git

[http] sslVerify=false

As this globally disables TLS(/SSL) certificate verification, it is not a solution I would recommend. This defeats the purpose of introducing SSL in the first place.

We’ll have to find a better solution, but we’ll leave that for another blog post…

Popular posts from this blog

Podman– Command execution failed with exit code 125

After updating WSL on one of the developer machines, Podman failed to work. When we took a look through Podman Desktop, we noticed that Podman had stopped running and returned the following error message: Error: Command execution failed with exit code 125 Here are the steps we tried to fix the issue: We started by running podman info to get some extra details on what could be wrong: >podman info OS: windows/amd64 provider: wsl version: 5.3.1 Cannot connect to Podman. Please verify your connection to the Linux system using `podman system connection list`, or try `podman machine init` and `podman machine start` to manage a new Linux VM Error: unable to connect to Podman socket: failed to connect: dial tcp 127.0.0.1:2655: connectex: No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it. That makes sense as the podman VM was not running. Let’s check the VM: >podman machine list NAME         ...

Azure DevOps/ GitHub emoji

I’m really bad at remembering emoji’s. So here is cheat sheet with all emoji’s that can be used in tools that support the github emoji markdown markup: All credits go to rcaviers who created this list.

VS Code Planning mode

After the introduction of Plan mode in Visual Studio , it now also found its way into VS Code. Planning mode, or as I like to call it 'Hannibal mode', extends GitHub Copilot's Agent Mode capabilities to handle larger, multi-step coding tasks with a structured approach. Instead of jumping straight into code generation, Planning mode creates a detailed execution plan. If you want more details, have a look at my previous post . Putting plan mode into action VS Code takes a different approach compared to Visual Studio when using plan mode. Instead of a configuration setting that you can activate but have limited control over, planning is available as a separate chat mode/agent: I like this approach better than how Visual Studio does it as you have explicit control when plan mode is activated. Instead of immediately diving into execution, the plan agent creates a plan and asks some follow up questions: You can further edit the plan by clicking on ‘Open in Editor’: ...