Skip to main content

NHibernate–Persist vs Save

While reviewing some code today I noticed that a developer was using the NHibernate session.PersistAsyc() method to save an entity in the database. I always used the session.SaveAsync() method so I was kinda intrigued about the difference between the two.

Let’s first talk about how they are the same; both methods make a transient instance persistent. This means that a new object created somewhere inside your code will be inserted into the database using an INSERT statement.

The picture below explains the different states of an NHibernate object quite well:

nhibernatestates

The differences

Ok, now we know in which way they are the same. How are they different then?

  • The SaveAsync() method returns the persisted object whereas the PersistAsync() method returns nothing.
  • The PersistAsync() method doesn't guarantee that the identifier value will be assigned to the persistent instance immediately, the assignment might happen at flush time. This means that when calling the SaveAsync() method, the INSERT operation is executed immediatelly.
  • Calling SaveAsync() on a detached entity will result in a new INSERT statement whereas calling PersistAsync will throw an exception.
  • Calling PersistAsync() outside of transaction boundaries will do nothing whereas doing the same using SaveAsync will result in the execution of an INSERT statement.

If you know more differences, please feel free to share…

Popular posts from this blog

Azure DevOps/ GitHub emoji

I’m really bad at remembering emoji’s. So here is cheat sheet with all emoji’s that can be used in tools that support the github emoji markdown markup: All credits go to rcaviers who created this list.

Podman– Command execution failed with exit code 125

After updating WSL on one of the developer machines, Podman failed to work. When we took a look through Podman Desktop, we noticed that Podman had stopped running and returned the following error message: Error: Command execution failed with exit code 125 Here are the steps we tried to fix the issue: We started by running podman info to get some extra details on what could be wrong: >podman info OS: windows/amd64 provider: wsl version: 5.3.1 Cannot connect to Podman. Please verify your connection to the Linux system using `podman system connection list`, or try `podman machine init` and `podman machine start` to manage a new Linux VM Error: unable to connect to Podman socket: failed to connect: dial tcp 127.0.0.1:2655: connectex: No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it. That makes sense as the podman VM was not running. Let’s check the VM: >podman machine list NAME         ...

Cleaner switch expressions with pattern matching in C#

Ever find yourself mapping multiple string values to the same result? Being a C# developer for a long time, I sometimes forget that the C# has evolved so I still dare to chain case labels or reach for a dictionary. Of course with pattern matching this is no longer necessary. With pattern matching, you can express things inline, declaratively, and with zero repetition. A small example I was working on a small script that should invoke different actions depending on the environment. As our developers were using different variations for the same environment e.g.  "tst" alongside "test" , "prd" alongside "prod" .  We asked to streamline this a long time ago, but as these things happen, we still see variations in the wild. This brought me to the following code that is a perfect example for pattern matching: The or keyword here is a logical pattern combinator , not a boolean operator. It matches if either of the specified pattern...