Skip to main content

DevIntersection 2014 – Interviewing developers

At the moment I’m in Las Vegas attending DevIntersection. Next to all the technical sessions, there was a whole track dedicated to leadership.

InterviewInProgress

One of the sessions in the Leadership track was ‘Interviewing Developers’ by Billy Hollis. Here are some of the notes I made during the session:

  • Keep a professional attitude.
    • You are here to find the perfect match for your team not to get new friends.
    • Don’t try to become friends with the candidate. If you hire him (or her) you get time enough to get acquainted.
  • It’s a good idea to ask the candidate to send some code up front. This should not be a whole project but just some files the developer can share.
    • Unfortunately some developers work on proprietary projects and cannot provide any code.
  • Do a review of the application letter.
    • Chances are high that the candidate did write this letter himself, which could not be the case for his CV.
    • Don’t be merciful on spelling mistakes!
  • Do a full analysis of the CV.
    • Especially look at the project length and the time they stayed at the same customer(longer is better)
  • Listen to your first impression.
    • But don’t listen too much. :-)
  • Keep a neutral tone and posture during the interview.
    • People try to read your body language and change their answer accordingly.
  • Be aware for defensiveness
    • Development is a trial-and-error process. Making mistakes is part of our job. Look how the candidate handles mistakes and can learn from them.
  • Don’t make too much notes during the interview.
    • It distracts the candidate.
  • Ask open ended questions.
  • Avoid telephone interviews.
    • If it is not possible to see the candidate in person, use Skype(or a similar tool).
  • An interview should not take too long(not more than one hour).
    • After one hour, nature kicks in and the candidate will probably need to use the bathroom :-)

Billy also gave a whole list of sample questions which he asked not to share. So I will not add them here. If you want to know these questions, apply for a job at my company ;-)

Remark: Billy mentioned that he will probably create a Pluralsight course based on this talk, so watch out for it…

Popular posts from this blog

Azure DevOps/ GitHub emoji

I’m really bad at remembering emoji’s. So here is cheat sheet with all emoji’s that can be used in tools that support the github emoji markdown markup: All credits go to rcaviers who created this list.

Podman– Command execution failed with exit code 125

After updating WSL on one of the developer machines, Podman failed to work. When we took a look through Podman Desktop, we noticed that Podman had stopped running and returned the following error message: Error: Command execution failed with exit code 125 Here are the steps we tried to fix the issue: We started by running podman info to get some extra details on what could be wrong: >podman info OS: windows/amd64 provider: wsl version: 5.3.1 Cannot connect to Podman. Please verify your connection to the Linux system using `podman system connection list`, or try `podman machine init` and `podman machine start` to manage a new Linux VM Error: unable to connect to Podman socket: failed to connect: dial tcp 127.0.0.1:2655: connectex: No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it. That makes sense as the podman VM was not running. Let’s check the VM: >podman machine list NAME         ...

Cleaner switch expressions with pattern matching in C#

Ever find yourself mapping multiple string values to the same result? Being a C# developer for a long time, I sometimes forget that the C# has evolved so I still dare to chain case labels or reach for a dictionary. Of course with pattern matching this is no longer necessary. With pattern matching, you can express things inline, declaratively, and with zero repetition. A small example I was working on a small script that should invoke different actions depending on the environment. As our developers were using different variations for the same environment e.g.  "tst" alongside "test" , "prd" alongside "prod" .  We asked to streamline this a long time ago, but as these things happen, we still see variations in the wild. This brought me to the following code that is a perfect example for pattern matching: The or keyword here is a logical pattern combinator , not a boolean operator. It matches if either of the specified pattern...