Skip to main content

Azure Websites–Staged deployment

One advantage that the traditional Azure Cloud Services had over Azure Websites was the support for VIP swap. This allowed you to switch your development and production environment with one click. You could deploy your application first to the test environment, check if everything is working as expected and then switch to production. The only difference between the 2 environments is that one is using the ‘real’ url of your cloud service where the other is using an auto generated GUID.

If you wanted a similar experience using Azure Websites, you had to deploy to multiple sites. This has now changed thanks to the introduction of Deployment Slots.

From the documentation:

The option to create site slots for Standard mode sites running on Microsoft Azure Web Sites enables a staged deployment workflow. Create development or staging site slots for each default production site (which now becomes a production slot) and swap these slots with no down time. Staged deployment is invaluable for the following scenarios:

  • Validating before deployment - After you deploy content or configuration to a staging site slot, you can validate changes before swapping these changes to production.

  • Building and integrating site content - You can incrementally add content updates to your staging deployment slot, and then swap the deployment slot into production when your updates are completed.

  • Rolling back a production site - If the changes swapped into production are not as you expected, you can swap the original content back to production right away.

Microsoft Azure warms up all instances of the source site slot before the swap to production, eliminating cold starts when you deploy content. The traffic redirection is seamless, and no requests are dropped as a result of swap operations. Four deployment slots in addition to the default production slot are supported per Standard web site.

Each deployment slot has its own publish settings, so the deployment experience in Visual Studio using Web Deploy remains similar(and also Source Control Integration is still an option).

image

More information here: http://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/documentation/articles/web-sites-staged-publishing/

Popular posts from this blog

Podman– Command execution failed with exit code 125

After updating WSL on one of the developer machines, Podman failed to work. When we took a look through Podman Desktop, we noticed that Podman had stopped running and returned the following error message: Error: Command execution failed with exit code 125 Here are the steps we tried to fix the issue: We started by running podman info to get some extra details on what could be wrong: >podman info OS: windows/amd64 provider: wsl version: 5.3.1 Cannot connect to Podman. Please verify your connection to the Linux system using `podman system connection list`, or try `podman machine init` and `podman machine start` to manage a new Linux VM Error: unable to connect to Podman socket: failed to connect: dial tcp 127.0.0.1:2655: connectex: No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it. That makes sense as the podman VM was not running. Let’s check the VM: >podman machine list NAME         ...

Cache stampede: when our cache turned against us

While investigating some performance issues, we ran into an ASP.NET Core API that cached a fairly expensive aggregation query for 60 seconds. Under normal load, that was fine: one request rebuilds the cache, everyone else reads from it. Under peak load, dozens of requests would arrive in that same expiry window, all see a cache miss, and all fire the same expensive query in parallel. The database didn't like that. That was the moment when our caching layer stopped helping and started hurting. A burst of requests comes in at the same time, all miss the cache, and all go hammer the database or the downstream API at once. That's a cache stampede . The cache was supposed to protect our backend, and for a few hundred milliseconds it did the opposite. Why this happens IMemoryCache.GetOrCreate (and its async sibling) looks like it protects you, but it doesn't add any locking on its own. Look at the naive version: public async Task<Report> GetReportAsync(string key) ...

The role of ActivitySource in OpenTelemetry for .NET

While doing some pair programming to integrate OpenTelemetry tracing to a .NET application, we had a discussion on how to use the ActivitySource . It looks simple. You new one up, give it a name, start an activity, done. The discussion started when we added a second ActivitySource with the exact same name in a different class. This made us wonder: "Are we duplicating traces now? Is this a memory leak? Do we need a singleton?" So we decided to dig deeper. This post is what we learned… What ActivitySource actually is ActivitySource is part of System.Diagnostics , not part of the OpenTelemetry NuGet packages. Microsoft built tracing primitives directly into the BCL, and OpenTelemetry's .NET SDK simply listens to them. This is why you can add distributed tracing to a library without taking a dependency on OpenTelemetry at all. An ActivitySource is a factory for Activity objects, and an Activity is .NET's name for what OpenTelemetry calls a span.(don’t ask m...