Skip to main content

Azure Websites–Staged deployment

One advantage that the traditional Azure Cloud Services had over Azure Websites was the support for VIP swap. This allowed you to switch your development and production environment with one click. You could deploy your application first to the test environment, check if everything is working as expected and then switch to production. The only difference between the 2 environments is that one is using the ‘real’ url of your cloud service where the other is using an auto generated GUID.

If you wanted a similar experience using Azure Websites, you had to deploy to multiple sites. This has now changed thanks to the introduction of Deployment Slots.

From the documentation:

The option to create site slots for Standard mode sites running on Microsoft Azure Web Sites enables a staged deployment workflow. Create development or staging site slots for each default production site (which now becomes a production slot) and swap these slots with no down time. Staged deployment is invaluable for the following scenarios:

  • Validating before deployment - After you deploy content or configuration to a staging site slot, you can validate changes before swapping these changes to production.

  • Building and integrating site content - You can incrementally add content updates to your staging deployment slot, and then swap the deployment slot into production when your updates are completed.

  • Rolling back a production site - If the changes swapped into production are not as you expected, you can swap the original content back to production right away.

Microsoft Azure warms up all instances of the source site slot before the swap to production, eliminating cold starts when you deploy content. The traffic redirection is seamless, and no requests are dropped as a result of swap operations. Four deployment slots in addition to the default production slot are supported per Standard web site.

Each deployment slot has its own publish settings, so the deployment experience in Visual Studio using Web Deploy remains similar(and also Source Control Integration is still an option).

image

More information here: http://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/documentation/articles/web-sites-staged-publishing/

Popular posts from this blog

Azure DevOps/ GitHub emoji

I’m really bad at remembering emoji’s. So here is cheat sheet with all emoji’s that can be used in tools that support the github emoji markdown markup: All credits go to rcaviers who created this list.

Podman– Command execution failed with exit code 125

After updating WSL on one of the developer machines, Podman failed to work. When we took a look through Podman Desktop, we noticed that Podman had stopped running and returned the following error message: Error: Command execution failed with exit code 125 Here are the steps we tried to fix the issue: We started by running podman info to get some extra details on what could be wrong: >podman info OS: windows/amd64 provider: wsl version: 5.3.1 Cannot connect to Podman. Please verify your connection to the Linux system using `podman system connection list`, or try `podman machine init` and `podman machine start` to manage a new Linux VM Error: unable to connect to Podman socket: failed to connect: dial tcp 127.0.0.1:2655: connectex: No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it. That makes sense as the podman VM was not running. Let’s check the VM: >podman machine list NAME         ...

Cleaner switch expressions with pattern matching in C#

Ever find yourself mapping multiple string values to the same result? Being a C# developer for a long time, I sometimes forget that the C# has evolved so I still dare to chain case labels or reach for a dictionary. Of course with pattern matching this is no longer necessary. With pattern matching, you can express things inline, declaratively, and with zero repetition. A small example I was working on a small script that should invoke different actions depending on the environment. As our developers were using different variations for the same environment e.g.  "tst" alongside "test" , "prd" alongside "prod" .  We asked to streamline this a long time ago, but as these things happen, we still see variations in the wild. This brought me to the following code that is a perfect example for pattern matching: The or keyword here is a logical pattern combinator , not a boolean operator. It matches if either of the specified pattern...