Skip to main content

Improve your application performance by doing nothing(or almost)

One of the optimizations you get for free in the new .NET Framework 4.5 release is Multicore JIT compilation.  Today, the assumption is that you have at least two processors. This feature takes advantage of this extra processing power by using parallelization to reduce the JIT compilation time during application startup.
If you want to get all the details, check the following post http://blogs.msdn.com/b/dotnet/archive/2012/10/18/an-easy-solution-for-improving-app-launch-performance.aspx
Enable Multicore JIT for your ASP.NET web applications
For your ASP.NET web applications it’s easy, you have to do nothing. Once your application/webserver is upgraded to ASP.NET 4.5, your application start up will go faster. Microsoft took into consideration that ASP.NET applications runs in a hosted environment, so they turned on Multicore JIT for these applications automatically. So if you're running ASP.NET 4.5, you don't have to do any extra work to turn on Multicore JIT.
If you want to turn Multicore JIT off in your ASP.NET 4.5 applications, use the new profileGuidedOptimizations flag in the web.config file as follows:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?> 
<configuration> 
 <!-- ... --> 
 <system.web>  
  <compilation profileGuidedOptimizations="None" />  
  <!-- ... -->  
 </system.web> 
</configuration>

Enable Multicore JIT for your Windows client applications
In a Windows client application, all you need to do is use the System.Runtime.ProfileOptimization class to start profiling at the entry point of your application—the rest happens automatically.

public App() 
{
    ProfileOptimization.SetProfileRoot(@"C:\MyAppFolder");
    ProfileOptimization.StartProfile("Startup.Profile");
}  

The SetProfileRoot call tells the runtime where to store JIT profiles, and the StartProfile call enables Multicore JIT by using the provided profile name. The first time your application is launched, the profile does not exist, so Multicore JIT operates in recording mode and writes out a profile to the specified location. The second time your application launches, the CLR loads the profile from the previous launch, and Multicore JIT operates in playback mode.


Popular posts from this blog

Podman– Command execution failed with exit code 125

After updating WSL on one of the developer machines, Podman failed to work. When we took a look through Podman Desktop, we noticed that Podman had stopped running and returned the following error message: Error: Command execution failed with exit code 125 Here are the steps we tried to fix the issue: We started by running podman info to get some extra details on what could be wrong: >podman info OS: windows/amd64 provider: wsl version: 5.3.1 Cannot connect to Podman. Please verify your connection to the Linux system using `podman system connection list`, or try `podman machine init` and `podman machine start` to manage a new Linux VM Error: unable to connect to Podman socket: failed to connect: dial tcp 127.0.0.1:2655: connectex: No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it. That makes sense as the podman VM was not running. Let’s check the VM: >podman machine list NAME         ...

Azure DevOps/ GitHub emoji

I’m really bad at remembering emoji’s. So here is cheat sheet with all emoji’s that can be used in tools that support the github emoji markdown markup: All credits go to rcaviers who created this list.

Cleaner switch expressions with pattern matching in C#

Ever find yourself mapping multiple string values to the same result? Being a C# developer for a long time, I sometimes forget that the C# has evolved so I still dare to chain case labels or reach for a dictionary. Of course with pattern matching this is no longer necessary. With pattern matching, you can express things inline, declaratively, and with zero repetition. A small example I was working on a small script that should invoke different actions depending on the environment. As our developers were using different variations for the same environment e.g.  "tst" alongside "test" , "prd" alongside "prod" .  We asked to streamline this a long time ago, but as these things happen, we still see variations in the wild. This brought me to the following code that is a perfect example for pattern matching: The or keyword here is a logical pattern combinator , not a boolean operator. It matches if either of the specified pattern...