Skip to main content

Farewell WCF Web API… Welcome ASP.NET Web API

***Important remark: this is all unofficial information I have found while browsing through the WCF Web API discussion board. So feel free to leave a comment if some of the things I’ve found are not correct.***
WCF Web API will die soon. But in it’s ashes a new API is born, this time based on ASP.NET instead of WCF.
I found the following information about this:
  • Web API will be coming late February as part of the ASP.NET MVC 4 beta.
  • RTM in Q3 2012
  • Will support ASP.NET 4.0, including a HttpClient implementation
  • ASP.NET Web API is not limited to only MVC4, possible to host in WebForms for example.
  • ASP.NET Web API is a separate assembly with no dependency on system.web.mvc.dll
  • Deep integration with MVC routing to identify resources, including default values and constraints
  • Web API uses MapHttpRoute() with a routeTemplate ("api/{controller}/{id}"), very similar to the MVC .MapRoute.
    • UriTemplates not attributes on methods anymore.
    • Discovers actions based on method name (Get, Post etc), but possible to override with attributes.
  • HttpOperationHandler replaced by MVC ActionFilters.
  • Authorization filter attributes, just like MVC
  • Exception filters
  • All stack is async Task based.
  • Web API classes inherit from ApiController base class
    • Instantiated per request, stateless
  • HTTP methods are now like MVC actions
  • Official site will probably be (not working at the moment): http://asp.net/web-api
  • HttpResponseException and HttpResponseMessage/Request still there
  • MVC-like model binding to input parameters
  • Model binding validation using filters and data annotations!
  • Message body bound to types using MediaTypeFormatters
  • Content negotiation supported based on Accept header
  • No static context objects
  • HttpRequestMessage.Properties is still the way to keep request context
  • Out-of-the box IOC integration through DependencyResolver
  • OData supported simply by returning IQueryable<T> from actions, the rest is automatic.
  • Web API/MVC ships with dynamic JsonObject types
  • Supports hosting in IIS or self-hosting.
  • Only a tiny bit of WCF left in there(in the self-host client).
  • Supports JSON.NET out of the box.

Popular posts from this blog

Podman– Command execution failed with exit code 125

After updating WSL on one of the developer machines, Podman failed to work. When we took a look through Podman Desktop, we noticed that Podman had stopped running and returned the following error message: Error: Command execution failed with exit code 125 Here are the steps we tried to fix the issue: We started by running podman info to get some extra details on what could be wrong: >podman info OS: windows/amd64 provider: wsl version: 5.3.1 Cannot connect to Podman. Please verify your connection to the Linux system using `podman system connection list`, or try `podman machine init` and `podman machine start` to manage a new Linux VM Error: unable to connect to Podman socket: failed to connect: dial tcp 127.0.0.1:2655: connectex: No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it. That makes sense as the podman VM was not running. Let’s check the VM: >podman machine list NAME         ...

Azure DevOps/ GitHub emoji

I’m really bad at remembering emoji’s. So here is cheat sheet with all emoji’s that can be used in tools that support the github emoji markdown markup: All credits go to rcaviers who created this list.

VS Code Planning mode

After the introduction of Plan mode in Visual Studio , it now also found its way into VS Code. Planning mode, or as I like to call it 'Hannibal mode', extends GitHub Copilot's Agent Mode capabilities to handle larger, multi-step coding tasks with a structured approach. Instead of jumping straight into code generation, Planning mode creates a detailed execution plan. If you want more details, have a look at my previous post . Putting plan mode into action VS Code takes a different approach compared to Visual Studio when using plan mode. Instead of a configuration setting that you can activate but have limited control over, planning is available as a separate chat mode/agent: I like this approach better than how Visual Studio does it as you have explicit control when plan mode is activated. Instead of immediately diving into execution, the plan agent creates a plan and asks some follow up questions: You can further edit the plan by clicking on ‘Open in Editor’: ...