Skip to main content

WebActivator: How to control the order of execution?

One of the libraries we use during web development is WebActivator. WebActivator was introduced with NuGet to solve the following problem. 

With the current NuGet version it is not possible to alter existing code. This means that if you have a NuGet package that requires some extra coding executed (for example in the global.asax), that you need to add this extra code yourself, breaking the nice experience that NuGet gives you. To solve this issue, David Ebbo introduced WebActivator. This library allows you to add startup code in separate files instead of having to add it to your global.asax. This overcomes the current limitation of NuGet.

To use this library create an App_Start folder. Add a class file to this folder and include the following code:

using System;
[assembly: WebActivator.PreApplicationStartMethod(typeof(App_Start.MyApp), "PreStart")]
namespace App_Start 
{    
public static class MySuperPackage 
{
public static void PreStart() 
{            
// Add your start logic here
}    
}
}

And that's it! Now your code will be called early on when the app starts.

After adding a few of this Start classes, we hit a problem. Some of these start scripts had a dependency on each other, meaning that the order of execution did matter. It took us some time to discover the following feature:
Ability to run code after Application_Start

When you use a WebActivator PreApplicationStartMethod attribute, the method it points to runs before your global.asax’s.  There is an alternative attribute that runs after the very first HttpModule get initialized, called PostApplicationStartMethod!

[assembly: WebActivator.PostApplicationStartMethod(typeof(App_Start.MyStartupCode), "CallMeAfterAppStart")]

After changing some of the classes to the PostApplicationStartMethod,  everything worked.

Popular posts from this blog

Azure DevOps/ GitHub emoji

I’m really bad at remembering emoji’s. So here is cheat sheet with all emoji’s that can be used in tools that support the github emoji markdown markup: All credits go to rcaviers who created this list.

Podman– Command execution failed with exit code 125

After updating WSL on one of the developer machines, Podman failed to work. When we took a look through Podman Desktop, we noticed that Podman had stopped running and returned the following error message: Error: Command execution failed with exit code 125 Here are the steps we tried to fix the issue: We started by running podman info to get some extra details on what could be wrong: >podman info OS: windows/amd64 provider: wsl version: 5.3.1 Cannot connect to Podman. Please verify your connection to the Linux system using `podman system connection list`, or try `podman machine init` and `podman machine start` to manage a new Linux VM Error: unable to connect to Podman socket: failed to connect: dial tcp 127.0.0.1:2655: connectex: No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it. That makes sense as the podman VM was not running. Let’s check the VM: >podman machine list NAME         ...

Cleaner switch expressions with pattern matching in C#

Ever find yourself mapping multiple string values to the same result? Being a C# developer for a long time, I sometimes forget that the C# has evolved so I still dare to chain case labels or reach for a dictionary. Of course with pattern matching this is no longer necessary. With pattern matching, you can express things inline, declaratively, and with zero repetition. A small example I was working on a small script that should invoke different actions depending on the environment. As our developers were using different variations for the same environment e.g.  "tst" alongside "test" , "prd" alongside "prod" .  We asked to streamline this a long time ago, but as these things happen, we still see variations in the wild. This brought me to the following code that is a perfect example for pattern matching: The or keyword here is a logical pattern combinator , not a boolean operator. It matches if either of the specified pattern...