Skip to main content

WebActivator: How to control the order of execution?

One of the libraries we use during web development is WebActivator. WebActivator was introduced with NuGet to solve the following problem. 

With the current NuGet version it is not possible to alter existing code. This means that if you have a NuGet package that requires some extra coding executed (for example in the global.asax), that you need to add this extra code yourself, breaking the nice experience that NuGet gives you. To solve this issue, David Ebbo introduced WebActivator. This library allows you to add startup code in separate files instead of having to add it to your global.asax. This overcomes the current limitation of NuGet.

To use this library create an App_Start folder. Add a class file to this folder and include the following code:

using System;
[assembly: WebActivator.PreApplicationStartMethod(typeof(App_Start.MyApp), "PreStart")]
namespace App_Start 
{    
public static class MySuperPackage 
{
public static void PreStart() 
{            
// Add your start logic here
}    
}
}

And that's it! Now your code will be called early on when the app starts.

After adding a few of this Start classes, we hit a problem. Some of these start scripts had a dependency on each other, meaning that the order of execution did matter. It took us some time to discover the following feature:
Ability to run code after Application_Start

When you use a WebActivator PreApplicationStartMethod attribute, the method it points to runs before your global.asax’s.  There is an alternative attribute that runs after the very first HttpModule get initialized, called PostApplicationStartMethod!

[assembly: WebActivator.PostApplicationStartMethod(typeof(App_Start.MyStartupCode), "CallMeAfterAppStart")]

After changing some of the classes to the PostApplicationStartMethod,  everything worked.

Popular posts from this blog

Podman– Command execution failed with exit code 125

After updating WSL on one of the developer machines, Podman failed to work. When we took a look through Podman Desktop, we noticed that Podman had stopped running and returned the following error message: Error: Command execution failed with exit code 125 Here are the steps we tried to fix the issue: We started by running podman info to get some extra details on what could be wrong: >podman info OS: windows/amd64 provider: wsl version: 5.3.1 Cannot connect to Podman. Please verify your connection to the Linux system using `podman system connection list`, or try `podman machine init` and `podman machine start` to manage a new Linux VM Error: unable to connect to Podman socket: failed to connect: dial tcp 127.0.0.1:2655: connectex: No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it. That makes sense as the podman VM was not running. Let’s check the VM: >podman machine list NAME         ...

Azure DevOps/ GitHub emoji

I’m really bad at remembering emoji’s. So here is cheat sheet with all emoji’s that can be used in tools that support the github emoji markdown markup: All credits go to rcaviers who created this list.

VS Code Planning mode

After the introduction of Plan mode in Visual Studio , it now also found its way into VS Code. Planning mode, or as I like to call it 'Hannibal mode', extends GitHub Copilot's Agent Mode capabilities to handle larger, multi-step coding tasks with a structured approach. Instead of jumping straight into code generation, Planning mode creates a detailed execution plan. If you want more details, have a look at my previous post . Putting plan mode into action VS Code takes a different approach compared to Visual Studio when using plan mode. Instead of a configuration setting that you can activate but have limited control over, planning is available as a separate chat mode/agent: I like this approach better than how Visual Studio does it as you have explicit control when plan mode is activated. Instead of immediately diving into execution, the plan agent creates a plan and asks some follow up questions: You can further edit the plan by clicking on ‘Open in Editor’: ...