Skip to main content

Use dotnet pack with nuspec file

My understanding has always been that when packaging a library in a nuget package, I had 2 options available:

  • Option 1 - Using a nuspec file with nuget pack command
  • Option 2 - Using a csproj file with dotnet pack command

Turns out I was wrong. So I want to use this post to explain where I was wrong. But before I do that let me dive into the 2 options above…

Using a nuspec file with nuget pack

One option you have is to put all the metadata for your nuget package inside a nuspec file. Here is how such a file can look like:

To transform this nuspec file to a valid nuget package, use the following command:

nuget pack example.nuspec

Using a csproj file with dotnet pack

A second option is to put all the metadata inside your csproj file:

Now we can transform this to a valid nuget package, use the following command

dotnet pack example.csproj

Where was I wrong?

Both of the options above work, but first of all I though that these are the only options(my first mistake) and second I thought that these options were mutually exclusive(my second mistake).

My first mistake

Next to the 2 commands above you can also use msbuild directly:

# Uses the project file in the current folder by default
msbuild -t:pack
 

You can trigger the same command by setting the following property inside your csproj file:

<GeneratePackageOnBuild>true</GeneratePackageOnBuild>

My second mistake

I also discovered that you can still use a nuspec file when using dotnet pack. Inside your csproj file you can point to the location of a nuspec file:

More information

NuGet Command-Line Interface (CLI) Reference | Microsoft Learn

dotnet pack command - .NET CLI | Microsoft Learn

Popular posts from this blog

Podman– Command execution failed with exit code 125

After updating WSL on one of the developer machines, Podman failed to work. When we took a look through Podman Desktop, we noticed that Podman had stopped running and returned the following error message: Error: Command execution failed with exit code 125 Here are the steps we tried to fix the issue: We started by running podman info to get some extra details on what could be wrong: >podman info OS: windows/amd64 provider: wsl version: 5.3.1 Cannot connect to Podman. Please verify your connection to the Linux system using `podman system connection list`, or try `podman machine init` and `podman machine start` to manage a new Linux VM Error: unable to connect to Podman socket: failed to connect: dial tcp 127.0.0.1:2655: connectex: No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it. That makes sense as the podman VM was not running. Let’s check the VM: >podman machine list NAME         ...

Azure DevOps/ GitHub emoji

I’m really bad at remembering emoji’s. So here is cheat sheet with all emoji’s that can be used in tools that support the github emoji markdown markup: All credits go to rcaviers who created this list.

VS Code Planning mode

After the introduction of Plan mode in Visual Studio , it now also found its way into VS Code. Planning mode, or as I like to call it 'Hannibal mode', extends GitHub Copilot's Agent Mode capabilities to handle larger, multi-step coding tasks with a structured approach. Instead of jumping straight into code generation, Planning mode creates a detailed execution plan. If you want more details, have a look at my previous post . Putting plan mode into action VS Code takes a different approach compared to Visual Studio when using plan mode. Instead of a configuration setting that you can activate but have limited control over, planning is available as a separate chat mode/agent: I like this approach better than how Visual Studio does it as you have explicit control when plan mode is activated. Instead of immediately diving into execution, the plan agent creates a plan and asks some follow up questions: You can further edit the plan by clicking on ‘Open in Editor’: ...