Skip to main content

SQL Server–Does a ‘LIKE’ query benefits from having an index?

Last week I was interviewing a possible new colleague for our team. During the conversation we were talking about database optimization techniques and of course indexing was one of the items on the list. While discussing this topic, the candidate made the following statement:

An index doesn’t help when using a LIKE statement in your query.

This was not in line with my idea. But he was so convinced that I decided to doublecheck. Hence this blog post…

Does a ‘LIKE’ query benefits from having an index?

Short answer: YES!

The somewhat longer answer: Yes, a LIKE statement can benefit from an index in SQL Server, but its effectiveness depends on how the LIKE pattern is constructed.

Let’s explain this with a small example.

We created a Products table and an index on the ProductName column.

Let’s now try multiple LIKE statement variations:

Suffix Wildcard (Efficient Index Usage)

This query will benefit from the index because the wildcard is at the end:

Prefix Wildcard (Inefficient Index Usage)

This query will not benefit effectively from the index because the wildcard is at the beginning:

SQL Server has to scan all rows to find any products that end with "Pro".

Infix Wildcard (Partial Index Usage)

This query may partially benefit from the index depending on the database engine's optimization:

SQL Server can use the index to find rows starting with "Lap" but needs to scan those rows to find the ones that also match "op" at the end.

No Wildcard (Full Index Usage)

This query will fully benefit from the index as it effectively performs an equality check:

SQL Server uses the index just like it would for a direct equality (=) condition.

More information

https://use-the-index-luke.com/sql/where-clause/searching-for-ranges/like-performance-tuning

Popular posts from this blog

Azure DevOps/ GitHub emoji

I’m really bad at remembering emoji’s. So here is cheat sheet with all emoji’s that can be used in tools that support the github emoji markdown markup: All credits go to rcaviers who created this list.

Podman– Command execution failed with exit code 125

After updating WSL on one of the developer machines, Podman failed to work. When we took a look through Podman Desktop, we noticed that Podman had stopped running and returned the following error message: Error: Command execution failed with exit code 125 Here are the steps we tried to fix the issue: We started by running podman info to get some extra details on what could be wrong: >podman info OS: windows/amd64 provider: wsl version: 5.3.1 Cannot connect to Podman. Please verify your connection to the Linux system using `podman system connection list`, or try `podman machine init` and `podman machine start` to manage a new Linux VM Error: unable to connect to Podman socket: failed to connect: dial tcp 127.0.0.1:2655: connectex: No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it. That makes sense as the podman VM was not running. Let’s check the VM: >podman machine list NAME         ...

Cleaner switch expressions with pattern matching in C#

Ever find yourself mapping multiple string values to the same result? Being a C# developer for a long time, I sometimes forget that the C# has evolved so I still dare to chain case labels or reach for a dictionary. Of course with pattern matching this is no longer necessary. With pattern matching, you can express things inline, declaratively, and with zero repetition. A small example I was working on a small script that should invoke different actions depending on the environment. As our developers were using different variations for the same environment e.g.  "tst" alongside "test" , "prd" alongside "prod" .  We asked to streamline this a long time ago, but as these things happen, we still see variations in the wild. This brought me to the following code that is a perfect example for pattern matching: The or keyword here is a logical pattern combinator , not a boolean operator. It matches if either of the specified pattern...