Skip to main content

ASP.NET Core–Use a Worker Service for scheduled batch processing

In .NET Core you can use Worker Services to create long-running services.

There are numerous reasons for creating long-running services such as:

  • Processing CPU intensive data.
  • Queuing work items in the background.
  • Performing a time-based operation on a schedule.

Through the Worker Service you can create cross platform background services that can be run as a Windows Service on Windows or a Systemd daemon in Linux.

You can create a worker service through:

dotnet new worker

or through the Visual Studio IDE:

Use a Worker Service for scheduled batch processing

At one of my clients, we typically didn’t use Worker Services for batch processing. Instead we used Console applications together with the Windows Task Scheduler. The advantage of this approach is that we didn’t need to write any scheduling logic and could use all the features and monitoring available through the built-in Task Scheduler.

However a disadvantage of this approach is that we couldn’t take advantage of the HostedService features. With  hosted services you get logging, configuration, and dependency injection (DI) for free and you can take advantage of  all libraries that work with the generic host and the knowledge that you already have from building ASP.NET Core applications.

The problem of Worker Services is that there are out-of-the-box setup to be always running and to never quit.

What if we could combine the advantages of the HostedService but stop it when the batch job has completed?

Let’s see how we can get this done…

When you create a new worker service, you get a Program.cs file that configures a Worker BackgroundService

And the  Worker class itself where you can do the work:

By default stopping the Worker will not stop the service host. The trick to shutdown the application after the batch job has completed is to inject the IHostApplicationLifetime and call StopApplication() when the work is done:

You can further improve this by adding exception handling and cancellation support but I leave that up to you…

Popular posts from this blog

Podman– Command execution failed with exit code 125

After updating WSL on one of the developer machines, Podman failed to work. When we took a look through Podman Desktop, we noticed that Podman had stopped running and returned the following error message: Error: Command execution failed with exit code 125 Here are the steps we tried to fix the issue: We started by running podman info to get some extra details on what could be wrong: >podman info OS: windows/amd64 provider: wsl version: 5.3.1 Cannot connect to Podman. Please verify your connection to the Linux system using `podman system connection list`, or try `podman machine init` and `podman machine start` to manage a new Linux VM Error: unable to connect to Podman socket: failed to connect: dial tcp 127.0.0.1:2655: connectex: No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it. That makes sense as the podman VM was not running. Let’s check the VM: >podman machine list NAME         ...

Cache stampede: when our cache turned against us

While investigating some performance issues, we ran into an ASP.NET Core API that cached a fairly expensive aggregation query for 60 seconds. Under normal load, that was fine: one request rebuilds the cache, everyone else reads from it. Under peak load, dozens of requests would arrive in that same expiry window, all see a cache miss, and all fire the same expensive query in parallel. The database didn't like that. That was the moment when our caching layer stopped helping and started hurting. A burst of requests comes in at the same time, all miss the cache, and all go hammer the database or the downstream API at once. That's a cache stampede . The cache was supposed to protect our backend, and for a few hundred milliseconds it did the opposite. Why this happens IMemoryCache.GetOrCreate (and its async sibling) looks like it protects you, but it doesn't add any locking on its own. Look at the naive version: public async Task<Report> GetReportAsync(string key) ...

A complex system designed from scratch never works

A few years ago, I worked as an architect on a big mainframe rewrite. I still count it as one of my failures. Not because the technology was wrong, but because I couldn't convince the management team to simplify the approach. Years later, the organization is still struggling to get the new system up and running. I left the project at the time, because I couldn't put my name behind an approach that would take very long and cost a lot of money without a working system to show for it along the way. Gall’s Law That memory keeps coming back to me, because it's a textbook case of Gall's Law playing out in real life. Gall's Law , from John Gall's Systemantics , states it plainly: A complex system that works is invariably found to have evolved from a simple system that worked. A complex system designed from scratch never works, and it cannot be patched to make it work. You have to start over with a simple system that works. What does that mean in practice,...