Skip to main content

Kubernetes - Reload your ASP.NET Core configuration when a configmap changes

Yesterday I blogged about configmaps and how changing the configmap is not picked up by ASP.NET Core. In this post I want to dig deeper in why this is the case and suggest a possible solution.

The CreateDefaultBuilder() method in ASP.NET Core will load your appsettings.json file and monitor it for changes (see the reloadOnChange: true):

Behind the scenes the reloadOnChange setting will monitor the config file for changes based on the last modified date. Seems logical…

Let’s continue to find out why this doesn’t work with Kubernetes. In Kubernetes a config map is mounted as a symlink:

kubectl exec -it <pod-name> -- bash
root@example-deployment-839f6c6546-c783b:/appg# ls -la
rwxrwxrwx 3 root root 4096 Mar 25  10:01 .
drwxr-xr-x 1 root root 4096 Mar 25 10:47 ..
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Mar 25 10:01 ..2021_03_25_10_01_16.386067924
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 31 Mar 25 10:01 ..data -> ..2021_03_25_10_01_16.386067924
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 53 Mar 25 10:47 appsettings.json -> ..data/appsettings.json

Unfortunately when you update the config map, the last modified date doesn’t change, although the file reference itself is updated. This is a known issue as discussed here.

One suggested workaround for this problem is to use a a configuration provider that understand symlinks(notice that this solution only works on linux):

Another possible solution is mentioned by Francisco Beltrao and uses the content itself to detect changes instead of the last modified date:

The code required for this solution can be found in this GitHub repo: https://github.com/fbeltrao/ConfigMapFileProvider

Popular posts from this blog

Podman– Command execution failed with exit code 125

After updating WSL on one of the developer machines, Podman failed to work. When we took a look through Podman Desktop, we noticed that Podman had stopped running and returned the following error message: Error: Command execution failed with exit code 125 Here are the steps we tried to fix the issue: We started by running podman info to get some extra details on what could be wrong: >podman info OS: windows/amd64 provider: wsl version: 5.3.1 Cannot connect to Podman. Please verify your connection to the Linux system using `podman system connection list`, or try `podman machine init` and `podman machine start` to manage a new Linux VM Error: unable to connect to Podman socket: failed to connect: dial tcp 127.0.0.1:2655: connectex: No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it. That makes sense as the podman VM was not running. Let’s check the VM: >podman machine list NAME         ...

Cache stampede: when our cache turned against us

While investigating some performance issues, we ran into an ASP.NET Core API that cached a fairly expensive aggregation query for 60 seconds. Under normal load, that was fine: one request rebuilds the cache, everyone else reads from it. Under peak load, dozens of requests would arrive in that same expiry window, all see a cache miss, and all fire the same expensive query in parallel. The database didn't like that. That was the moment when our caching layer stopped helping and started hurting. A burst of requests comes in at the same time, all miss the cache, and all go hammer the database or the downstream API at once. That's a cache stampede . The cache was supposed to protect our backend, and for a few hundred milliseconds it did the opposite. Why this happens IMemoryCache.GetOrCreate (and its async sibling) looks like it protects you, but it doesn't add any locking on its own. Look at the naive version: public async Task<Report> GetReportAsync(string key) ...

The role of ActivitySource in OpenTelemetry for .NET

While doing some pair programming to integrate OpenTelemetry tracing to a .NET application, we had a discussion on how to use the ActivitySource . It looks simple. You new one up, give it a name, start an activity, done. The discussion started when we added a second ActivitySource with the exact same name in a different class. This made us wonder: "Are we duplicating traces now? Is this a memory leak? Do we need a singleton?" So we decided to dig deeper. This post is what we learned… What ActivitySource actually is ActivitySource is part of System.Diagnostics , not part of the OpenTelemetry NuGet packages. Microsoft built tracing primitives directly into the BCL, and OpenTelemetry's .NET SDK simply listens to them. This is why you can add distributed tracing to a library without taking a dependency on OpenTelemetry at all. An ActivitySource is a factory for Activity objects, and an Activity is .NET's name for what OpenTelemetry calls a span.(don’t ask m...