Skip to main content

ORM- Attaching detached object trees

One of the nice features of an ORM is that it allows you to change a complete object tree and that the ORM will figure out what needs to be added, updated and deleted. The reason why this works is because a typical ORM will track by default all objects that are attached to the ORM abstraction(DBContext in EF Core and ISession in NHibernate). Because it tracks these objects (and their relations) it knows what should happen when you make a change.

Unfortunately when you are sending objects to a client through an API(typically using DTO’s and tools like Automapper) and you get a changed object tree back, the objects in this tree are no longer attached to the ORM, so it doesn’t know what should be inserted, updated or deleted. Luckily most ORM’s are smart and use different tricks to figure out what is changed.

However one place where these ORM’s typically fail is when you are using Automapper and mapping a child collection in your DTO’s to your domain model. An example below where we are FluentNHibernate:

Imagine that we have an existing Order entity with  an OrderDetail collection with following data:

{ Id: 22, OrderId: 49 }

And an OrderDetail DTO arrives with the following data:

{ Id: 22, OrderId: 49 }

{ Id: 23, OrderId: 49 }

This should result in an INSERT operation as 1 new OrderDetail is added. Instead this fails with the following error message:

NHibernate.NonUniqueObjectException: a different object with the same identifier value was already associated with the session: 22, of entity: OrderDetail

The reason why this fails is because Automapper by default creates a new collection when mapping from one type to another. This confuses NHibernate and makes him think that both OrderDetails are new and should be added. (A similar problem exists when using Entity Framework)

A possible fix is to use Automapper.Collection. This will Add/Update/Delete items from a preexisting collection object instead of creating a new collection.

To enable this add the Nuget package to your project and update the Automapper configuration:

Popular posts from this blog

Azure DevOps/ GitHub emoji

I’m really bad at remembering emoji’s. So here is cheat sheet with all emoji’s that can be used in tools that support the github emoji markdown markup: All credits go to rcaviers who created this list.

Podman– Command execution failed with exit code 125

After updating WSL on one of the developer machines, Podman failed to work. When we took a look through Podman Desktop, we noticed that Podman had stopped running and returned the following error message: Error: Command execution failed with exit code 125 Here are the steps we tried to fix the issue: We started by running podman info to get some extra details on what could be wrong: >podman info OS: windows/amd64 provider: wsl version: 5.3.1 Cannot connect to Podman. Please verify your connection to the Linux system using `podman system connection list`, or try `podman machine init` and `podman machine start` to manage a new Linux VM Error: unable to connect to Podman socket: failed to connect: dial tcp 127.0.0.1:2655: connectex: No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it. That makes sense as the podman VM was not running. Let’s check the VM: >podman machine list NAME         ...

Cleaner switch expressions with pattern matching in C#

Ever find yourself mapping multiple string values to the same result? Being a C# developer for a long time, I sometimes forget that the C# has evolved so I still dare to chain case labels or reach for a dictionary. Of course with pattern matching this is no longer necessary. With pattern matching, you can express things inline, declaratively, and with zero repetition. A small example I was working on a small script that should invoke different actions depending on the environment. As our developers were using different variations for the same environment e.g.  "tst" alongside "test" , "prd" alongside "prod" .  We asked to streamline this a long time ago, but as these things happen, we still see variations in the wild. This brought me to the following code that is a perfect example for pattern matching: The or keyword here is a logical pattern combinator , not a boolean operator. It matches if either of the specified pattern...