Skip to main content

IIS–Keep your application running

A few years ago I blogged about a way to keep your web application running in IIS. To summarize the blog posts, IIS 7.5 introduced the Application Initialization Module that allowed you to start a worker process without waiting for a request.

To activate this feature you have to dive into the applicationhost.config file directly and change the startMode of your application pool to alwaysRunning:

<system.applicationHost> 
<applicationPools>
<add name="DefaultAppPool" autoStart="true" startMode="alwaysRunning" />
</applicationPools>
</system.applicationHost>
This will guarantee that the moment your application pool is started, a worker process spins ups decreasing the time to handle the first request. 
Unfortunately the blog posts wasn’t complete. Although the steps above guarantee that a worker process is spinned up immediately, it doesn’t mean that the application is loaded into the worker process. 

The Application Initialization module provides a solution here by adding a new property to the application settings called preloadEnabled. We’ll have to dive into the applicationhost.config file again to set this value:

<system.applicationHost> 
<sites>
<site name="Default Web Site" id="1">
<application path="/">
<virtualDirectory path="/" physicalPath="%SystemDrive%\inetpub\wwwroot" />
</application>
<application name="WebApp1" applicationPool="DefaultAppPool" preloadEnabled="true">
<virtualDirectory path="/WebApp1" physicalPath="c:\inetpub\wwwroot\WebApp1" />
</application>
</site>
</sites>
</system.applicationHost>
This will guarantee that our application is always up and running.

What is happening behind the scenes?

From https://blogs.iis.net/wadeh/application-initialization-part-2:

Here's how Application Initialization uses this property.  When a new worker process spins up, Application Initialization will enumerate all of the applications that it will host and checks for this property.  For any application where preloadEnabled="true", it will build a URL corresponding to the default page for the application and run it through the pipeline.  This request does not go through the network, and there is no client listening for a response (IIS discards any data that would have gone to the client.)

This "fake" request accomplishes a few key things.  First, it goes through the IIS pipeline and kicks off an application start event.  This initializes a number of parts inside of IIS, and if the request is for ASP.NET, it will cause global.asax to run.  It also reaches the application, which will see it is the first request after starting.


Popular posts from this blog

Podman– Command execution failed with exit code 125

After updating WSL on one of the developer machines, Podman failed to work. When we took a look through Podman Desktop, we noticed that Podman had stopped running and returned the following error message: Error: Command execution failed with exit code 125 Here are the steps we tried to fix the issue: We started by running podman info to get some extra details on what could be wrong: >podman info OS: windows/amd64 provider: wsl version: 5.3.1 Cannot connect to Podman. Please verify your connection to the Linux system using `podman system connection list`, or try `podman machine init` and `podman machine start` to manage a new Linux VM Error: unable to connect to Podman socket: failed to connect: dial tcp 127.0.0.1:2655: connectex: No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it. That makes sense as the podman VM was not running. Let’s check the VM: >podman machine list NAME         ...

Azure DevOps/ GitHub emoji

I’m really bad at remembering emoji’s. So here is cheat sheet with all emoji’s that can be used in tools that support the github emoji markdown markup: All credits go to rcaviers who created this list.

Cache stampede: when our cache turned against us

While investigating some performance issues, we ran into an ASP.NET Core API that cached a fairly expensive aggregation query for 60 seconds. Under normal load, that was fine: one request rebuilds the cache, everyone else reads from it. Under peak load, dozens of requests would arrive in that same expiry window, all see a cache miss, and all fire the same expensive query in parallel. The database didn't like that. That was the moment when our caching layer stopped helping and started hurting. A burst of requests comes in at the same time, all miss the cache, and all go hammer the database or the downstream API at once. That's a cache stampede . The cache was supposed to protect our backend, and for a few hundred milliseconds it did the opposite. Why this happens IMemoryCache.GetOrCreate (and its async sibling) looks like it protects you, but it doesn't add any locking on its own. Look at the naive version: public async Task<Report> GetReportAsync(string key) ...