Skip to main content

SQL Server–Document your database using Extended Properties

On one of my projects we had to re-use an existing table. Unfortunately the table wasn’t documented very well(read; not at all). To make it even worse some of the columns were used for different things than you would expect based on the column names. The table even contained some implicit logic about the way the data was inserted into the table.

To avoid this horror again,  we decided to apply the boy scout rule and leave the camp place in a better state. We started by adding documentation to changed or newly added columns using the SQL Server Extended Properties feature.

You can add Extended Properties either through SQL Server Management Studio or through the sp_addextendedproperty stored procedure:

exec sp_addextendedproperty  
     @name = N'Price' 
    ,@value = N'Testing entry for Extended Property' 
    ,@level0type = N'Schema', @level0name = 'northwind' 
    ,@level1type = N'Table',  @level1name = 'Product' 
    ,@level2type = N'Column', @level2name = 'Price'
go			

A few parameters are required to execute sp_addextendedproperty.

  • @name is ‘Price’ in our case. This cannot be null. This is the name of the Extended Property.
  • @value is the value or description of the property and it cannot exceed 7500 bytes.
  • @level0type in our case ‘Schema’ and @level0name is the value is set as 'northwind' as the value
  • @level1type in our case ‘Table’ and @level1name is ‘Product’
  • @level2type in our case ‘Column’ and @level2name is ‘Price’

More information: https://www.mssqltips.com/sqlservertip/5384/working-with-sql-server-extended-properties/

Popular posts from this blog

Podman– Command execution failed with exit code 125

After updating WSL on one of the developer machines, Podman failed to work. When we took a look through Podman Desktop, we noticed that Podman had stopped running and returned the following error message: Error: Command execution failed with exit code 125 Here are the steps we tried to fix the issue: We started by running podman info to get some extra details on what could be wrong: >podman info OS: windows/amd64 provider: wsl version: 5.3.1 Cannot connect to Podman. Please verify your connection to the Linux system using `podman system connection list`, or try `podman machine init` and `podman machine start` to manage a new Linux VM Error: unable to connect to Podman socket: failed to connect: dial tcp 127.0.0.1:2655: connectex: No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it. That makes sense as the podman VM was not running. Let’s check the VM: >podman machine list NAME         ...

Azure DevOps/ GitHub emoji

I’m really bad at remembering emoji’s. So here is cheat sheet with all emoji’s that can be used in tools that support the github emoji markdown markup: All credits go to rcaviers who created this list.

VS Code Planning mode

After the introduction of Plan mode in Visual Studio , it now also found its way into VS Code. Planning mode, or as I like to call it 'Hannibal mode', extends GitHub Copilot's Agent Mode capabilities to handle larger, multi-step coding tasks with a structured approach. Instead of jumping straight into code generation, Planning mode creates a detailed execution plan. If you want more details, have a look at my previous post . Putting plan mode into action VS Code takes a different approach compared to Visual Studio when using plan mode. Instead of a configuration setting that you can activate but have limited control over, planning is available as a separate chat mode/agent: I like this approach better than how Visual Studio does it as you have explicit control when plan mode is activated. Instead of immediately diving into execution, the plan agent creates a plan and asks some follow up questions: You can further edit the plan by clicking on ‘Open in Editor’: ...