Skip to main content

Akka.NET–Testing the exceptional flow (Continued)

Yesterday I blogged about our approach to test Exceptions thrown by your Akka.NET actors. Today I want to talk about an issue we encountered when using our own ActorSystem.

In the example yesterday we were using the Sys property of the Akka.NET Testkit which gives us access to a built-in Actor System created for us:

var actor = Sys.ActorOf(Props.Create(() => new SampleActor()));

var filter = CreateEventFilter(Sys);

However when we tried to run the same test but using our own ActorSystem instance instead the test failed and no Exception was received by the EventFilter.

To understand why this fails, you have to understand what TestKit is doing behind the scenes when creating an ActorSystem for you. For every test you run it creates a new ActorSystem instance using the following configuration:

The important line here is the following:

loggers = ["Akka.TestKit.TestEventListener, Akka.TestKit"]

This line will link the TestKit EventFilter to the ActorSystem. As we didn’t had any configuration setup for our own ActorSystem, the EventFilter didn’t pick up any event.

To fix it, we included the configuration above in our app.config:

Popular posts from this blog

Podman– Command execution failed with exit code 125

After updating WSL on one of the developer machines, Podman failed to work. When we took a look through Podman Desktop, we noticed that Podman had stopped running and returned the following error message: Error: Command execution failed with exit code 125 Here are the steps we tried to fix the issue: We started by running podman info to get some extra details on what could be wrong: >podman info OS: windows/amd64 provider: wsl version: 5.3.1 Cannot connect to Podman. Please verify your connection to the Linux system using `podman system connection list`, or try `podman machine init` and `podman machine start` to manage a new Linux VM Error: unable to connect to Podman socket: failed to connect: dial tcp 127.0.0.1:2655: connectex: No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it. That makes sense as the podman VM was not running. Let’s check the VM: >podman machine list NAME         ...

Azure DevOps/ GitHub emoji

I’m really bad at remembering emoji’s. So here is cheat sheet with all emoji’s that can be used in tools that support the github emoji markdown markup: All credits go to rcaviers who created this list.

VS Code Planning mode

After the introduction of Plan mode in Visual Studio , it now also found its way into VS Code. Planning mode, or as I like to call it 'Hannibal mode', extends GitHub Copilot's Agent Mode capabilities to handle larger, multi-step coding tasks with a structured approach. Instead of jumping straight into code generation, Planning mode creates a detailed execution plan. If you want more details, have a look at my previous post . Putting plan mode into action VS Code takes a different approach compared to Visual Studio when using plan mode. Instead of a configuration setting that you can activate but have limited control over, planning is available as a separate chat mode/agent: I like this approach better than how Visual Studio does it as you have explicit control when plan mode is activated. Instead of immediately diving into execution, the plan agent creates a plan and asks some follow up questions: You can further edit the plan by clicking on ‘Open in Editor’: ...