Skip to main content

Web.config transformations in .NET Core

In a previous post I mentioned that we started to put environment variables inside our web.config files to change the ASPNETCORE_ENVIRONMENT setting inside our ASP.NET Core apps. As we were already using Web Deploy to deploy our ASP.NET Core applications, we decided to use the web.config transformations functionality to set the environment variable in our web.config to a correct value before deploying:

  • We created extra web.{environment}.config files

image

  • And added the Xdt transformation configuration:

However when we tried to deploy, we noticed that the transformation was not executed and that the original web.config file was used.

What did we do wrong?

The answer turned out to be “Nothing”. Unfortunately ASP.NET Core projects don’t support the transformation functionality. Luckily, a colleague(thanks Sami!) brought  the following library under my attention: https://github.com/nil4/dotnet-transform-xdt

dotnet-transform-xdt is a dotnet CLI tool for applying XML Document Transformation (typically, to ASP.NET configuration files at publish time, but not limited to this scenario).

That’s exactly what we need!

How to use dotnet-transform-xdt?

  • Right click on your ASP.NET Core project and choose Edit csproj
  • Add the following line to the list of Package references:

<DotNetCliToolReference Include="Microsoft.DotNet.Xdt.Tools" Version="2.0.0" />

  • Add the following target before the closing </project>:

<Target Name="ApplyXdtConfigTransform" BeforeTargets="_TransformWebConfig">
   <PropertyGroup>
     <_SourceWebConfig>$(MSBuildThisFileDirectory)Web.config</_SourceWebConfig>
     <_XdtTransform>$(MSBuildThisFileDirectory)Web.$(Configuration).config</_XdtTransform>
     <_TargetWebConfig>$(PublishDir)Web.config</_TargetWebConfig>
   </PropertyGroup>
   < Exec Command="dotnet transform-xdt --xml &quot;$(_SourceWebConfig)&quot; --transform &quot;$(_XdtTransform)&quot; --output &quot;$(_TargetWebConfig)&quot;" Condition="Exists('$(_XdtTransform)')" />
< /Target>

  • If you now run dotnet publish  and examine the Web.config in the publish output folder, a transformed web.config should be there…

Popular posts from this blog

Azure DevOps/ GitHub emoji

I’m really bad at remembering emoji’s. So here is cheat sheet with all emoji’s that can be used in tools that support the github emoji markdown markup: All credits go to rcaviers who created this list.

Podman– Command execution failed with exit code 125

After updating WSL on one of the developer machines, Podman failed to work. When we took a look through Podman Desktop, we noticed that Podman had stopped running and returned the following error message: Error: Command execution failed with exit code 125 Here are the steps we tried to fix the issue: We started by running podman info to get some extra details on what could be wrong: >podman info OS: windows/amd64 provider: wsl version: 5.3.1 Cannot connect to Podman. Please verify your connection to the Linux system using `podman system connection list`, or try `podman machine init` and `podman machine start` to manage a new Linux VM Error: unable to connect to Podman socket: failed to connect: dial tcp 127.0.0.1:2655: connectex: No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it. That makes sense as the podman VM was not running. Let’s check the VM: >podman machine list NAME         ...

Cleaner switch expressions with pattern matching in C#

Ever find yourself mapping multiple string values to the same result? Being a C# developer for a long time, I sometimes forget that the C# has evolved so I still dare to chain case labels or reach for a dictionary. Of course with pattern matching this is no longer necessary. With pattern matching, you can express things inline, declaratively, and with zero repetition. A small example I was working on a small script that should invoke different actions depending on the environment. As our developers were using different variations for the same environment e.g.  "tst" alongside "test" , "prd" alongside "prod" .  We asked to streamline this a long time ago, but as these things happen, we still see variations in the wild. This brought me to the following code that is a perfect example for pattern matching: The or keyword here is a logical pattern combinator , not a boolean operator. It matches if either of the specified pattern...