Skip to main content

Web.config transformations in .NET Core

In a previous post I mentioned that we started to put environment variables inside our web.config files to change the ASPNETCORE_ENVIRONMENT setting inside our ASP.NET Core apps. As we were already using Web Deploy to deploy our ASP.NET Core applications, we decided to use the web.config transformations functionality to set the environment variable in our web.config to a correct value before deploying:

  • We created extra web.{environment}.config files

image

  • And added the Xdt transformation configuration:

However when we tried to deploy, we noticed that the transformation was not executed and that the original web.config file was used.

What did we do wrong?

The answer turned out to be “Nothing”. Unfortunately ASP.NET Core projects don’t support the transformation functionality. Luckily, a colleague(thanks Sami!) brought  the following library under my attention: https://github.com/nil4/dotnet-transform-xdt

dotnet-transform-xdt is a dotnet CLI tool for applying XML Document Transformation (typically, to ASP.NET configuration files at publish time, but not limited to this scenario).

That’s exactly what we need!

How to use dotnet-transform-xdt?

  • Right click on your ASP.NET Core project and choose Edit csproj
  • Add the following line to the list of Package references:

<DotNetCliToolReference Include="Microsoft.DotNet.Xdt.Tools" Version="2.0.0" />

  • Add the following target before the closing </project>:

<Target Name="ApplyXdtConfigTransform" BeforeTargets="_TransformWebConfig">
   <PropertyGroup>
     <_SourceWebConfig>$(MSBuildThisFileDirectory)Web.config</_SourceWebConfig>
     <_XdtTransform>$(MSBuildThisFileDirectory)Web.$(Configuration).config</_XdtTransform>
     <_TargetWebConfig>$(PublishDir)Web.config</_TargetWebConfig>
   </PropertyGroup>
   < Exec Command="dotnet transform-xdt --xml &quot;$(_SourceWebConfig)&quot; --transform &quot;$(_XdtTransform)&quot; --output &quot;$(_TargetWebConfig)&quot;" Condition="Exists('$(_XdtTransform)')" />
< /Target>

  • If you now run dotnet publish  and examine the Web.config in the publish output folder, a transformed web.config should be there…

Popular posts from this blog

Podman– Command execution failed with exit code 125

After updating WSL on one of the developer machines, Podman failed to work. When we took a look through Podman Desktop, we noticed that Podman had stopped running and returned the following error message: Error: Command execution failed with exit code 125 Here are the steps we tried to fix the issue: We started by running podman info to get some extra details on what could be wrong: >podman info OS: windows/amd64 provider: wsl version: 5.3.1 Cannot connect to Podman. Please verify your connection to the Linux system using `podman system connection list`, or try `podman machine init` and `podman machine start` to manage a new Linux VM Error: unable to connect to Podman socket: failed to connect: dial tcp 127.0.0.1:2655: connectex: No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it. That makes sense as the podman VM was not running. Let’s check the VM: >podman machine list NAME         ...

Azure DevOps/ GitHub emoji

I’m really bad at remembering emoji’s. So here is cheat sheet with all emoji’s that can be used in tools that support the github emoji markdown markup: All credits go to rcaviers who created this list.

Cache stampede: when our cache turned against us

While investigating some performance issues, we ran into an ASP.NET Core API that cached a fairly expensive aggregation query for 60 seconds. Under normal load, that was fine: one request rebuilds the cache, everyone else reads from it. Under peak load, dozens of requests would arrive in that same expiry window, all see a cache miss, and all fire the same expensive query in parallel. The database didn't like that. That was the moment when our caching layer stopped helping and started hurting. A burst of requests comes in at the same time, all miss the cache, and all go hammer the database or the downstream API at once. That's a cache stampede . The cache was supposed to protect our backend, and for a few hundred milliseconds it did the opposite. Why this happens IMemoryCache.GetOrCreate (and its async sibling) looks like it protects you, but it doesn't add any locking on its own. Look at the naive version: public async Task<Report> GetReportAsync(string key) ...