Skip to main content

Windows Identity Foundation: SSO issue when browsing from one subsite to another

Last week I had some fun investigating a WIF issue. A colleague came to me and explained the following situation:

I have 2 sites under the same domain each configured as a separate application in IIS with their own applicationpool. Site 1 is available at my.domain.name/Site1. The other site is available at my.domain.name/Portal/Site2. When I login to site 1 through ADFS everything is ok. Then I go to site 2 where I also login. When I then move back to Site 1, I get the following error message:

The input is not a valid Base-64 string as it contains a non-base 64 character, more than two padding characters, or an illegal character among the padding characters.

clip_image001

When I investigated the issue, I noticed that the “same” FedAuth cookie was issued twice, once scoped to my.domain.name/Site1, once scoped to the root domain my.domain.name. When browsing back to Site1, WIF get both cookies(as both apply to the target domain). However as both cookies are issued for different websites, combining them results in an invalid cookie, explaining the error message above.

To solve this we had to change the WIF configuration to scope the cookie correctly:

The original config:

<system.identityModel.services>

    <federationConfiguration>

      <cookieHandler requireSsl="true" />

      <wsFederation passiveRedirectEnabled="false" issuer="https://adfs2/adfs/ls/" realm="https://my.domain.name/site1/" requireHttps="true" />

    </federationConfiguration>

</system.identityModel.services>

The updated config:

<system.identityModel.services>

    <federationConfiguration>

      <cookieHandler path="/" requireSsl="true" />

      <wsFederation passiveRedirectEnabled="false" issuer="https://adfs2/adfs/ls/" realm="https://my.domain.name/site1/" requireHttps="true" />

    </federationConfiguration>

</system.identityModel.services>

After doing that, we got an other error instead:

ID4291: The security token ‘System.IdentityModel.Tokens.SessionSecurityToken’ is not scoped to the current endpoint.

clip_image001[5]

This error is caused by the fact that both sites are using a different application pool.  To solve this second error, there are 2 possible solutions:

Solution 1

Run both sites using the same application pool.

Solution 2

Update your WIF configuration to use the MachineKeySessionSecurityTokenHandler instead of the default SessionSecurityTokenHandler:

<system.identityModel>

  <identityConfiguration>

    <securityTokenHandlers>

     <remove type="System.IdentityModel.Tokens.SessionSecurityTokenHandler, System.IdentityModel, Version=4.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=b77a5c561934e089" />

      <add type="System.IdentityModel.Services.Tokens.MachineKeySessionSecurityTokenHandler, System.IdentityModel.Services, Version=4.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=b77a5c561934e089" />

</securityTokenHandlers>

  </identityConfiguration>

</system.identityModel>

Popular posts from this blog

Podman– Command execution failed with exit code 125

After updating WSL on one of the developer machines, Podman failed to work. When we took a look through Podman Desktop, we noticed that Podman had stopped running and returned the following error message: Error: Command execution failed with exit code 125 Here are the steps we tried to fix the issue: We started by running podman info to get some extra details on what could be wrong: >podman info OS: windows/amd64 provider: wsl version: 5.3.1 Cannot connect to Podman. Please verify your connection to the Linux system using `podman system connection list`, or try `podman machine init` and `podman machine start` to manage a new Linux VM Error: unable to connect to Podman socket: failed to connect: dial tcp 127.0.0.1:2655: connectex: No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it. That makes sense as the podman VM was not running. Let’s check the VM: >podman machine list NAME         ...

Cache stampede: when our cache turned against us

While investigating some performance issues, we ran into an ASP.NET Core API that cached a fairly expensive aggregation query for 60 seconds. Under normal load, that was fine: one request rebuilds the cache, everyone else reads from it. Under peak load, dozens of requests would arrive in that same expiry window, all see a cache miss, and all fire the same expensive query in parallel. The database didn't like that. That was the moment when our caching layer stopped helping and started hurting. A burst of requests comes in at the same time, all miss the cache, and all go hammer the database or the downstream API at once. That's a cache stampede . The cache was supposed to protect our backend, and for a few hundred milliseconds it did the opposite. Why this happens IMemoryCache.GetOrCreate (and its async sibling) looks like it protects you, but it doesn't add any locking on its own. Look at the naive version: public async Task<Report> GetReportAsync(string key) ...

Azure DevOps/ GitHub emoji

I’m really bad at remembering emoji’s. So here is cheat sheet with all emoji’s that can be used in tools that support the github emoji markdown markup: All credits go to rcaviers who created this list.