Skip to main content

Subscribe to events using reflection

·When you use reflection to load and run assemblies, you cannot use language features like the C# += operator or the Visual Basic AddHandler statement to hook up events. This MSDN document (http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms228976.aspx) shows how to link an existing method to an event by getting all the necessary types through reflection and how to create a dynamic method using reflection emit and link it to an event.

A sample:

   1:          // Load an assembly, for example using the Assembly.Load
   2:          // method. In this case, the executing assembly is loaded, to
   3:          // keep the demonstration simple.
   4:          //
   5:          Assembly assem = Assembly.GetExecutingAssembly();
   6:   
   7:          // Get the type that is to be loaded, and create an instance 
   8:          // of it. Activator.CreateInstance has other overloads, if
   9:          // the type lacks a default constructor. The new instance
  10:          // is stored as type Object, to maintain the fiction that 
  11:          // nothing is known about the assembly. (Note that you can
  12:          // get the types in an assembly without knowing their names
  13:          // in advance.)
  14:          //
  15:          Type tExForm = assem.GetType("ExampleForm");
  16:          Object exFormAsObj = Activator.CreateInstance(tExForm);
  17:   
  18:          // Get an EventInfo representing the Click event, and get the
  19:          // type of delegate that handles the event.
  20:          //
  21:          EventInfo evClick = tExForm.GetEvent("Click");
  22:          Type tDelegate = evClick.EventHandlerType;
  23:   
  24:          // If you already have a method with the correct signature,
  25:          // you can simply get a MethodInfo for it. 
  26:          //
  27:          MethodInfo miHandler = 
  28:              typeof(Example).GetMethod("LuckyHandler", 
  29:                  BindingFlags.NonPublic | BindingFlags.Instance);
  30:              
  31:          // Create an instance of the delegate. Using the overloads
  32:          // of CreateDelegate that take MethodInfo is recommended.
  33:          //
  34:          Delegate d = Delegate.CreateDelegate(tDelegate, this, miHandler);
  35:   
  36:          // Get the "add" accessor of the event and invoke it late-
  37:          // bound, passing in the delegate instance. This is equivalent
  38:          // to using the += operator in C#, or AddHandler in Visual
  39:          // Basic. The instance on which the "add" accessor is invoked
  40:          // is the form; the arguments must be passed as an array.
  41:          //
  42:          MethodInfo addHandler = evClick.GetAddMethod();
  43:          Object[] addHandlerArgs = { d };
  44:          addHandler.Invoke(exFormAsObj, addHandlerArgs);


Some related links:


Popular posts from this blog

Podman– Command execution failed with exit code 125

After updating WSL on one of the developer machines, Podman failed to work. When we took a look through Podman Desktop, we noticed that Podman had stopped running and returned the following error message: Error: Command execution failed with exit code 125 Here are the steps we tried to fix the issue: We started by running podman info to get some extra details on what could be wrong: >podman info OS: windows/amd64 provider: wsl version: 5.3.1 Cannot connect to Podman. Please verify your connection to the Linux system using `podman system connection list`, or try `podman machine init` and `podman machine start` to manage a new Linux VM Error: unable to connect to Podman socket: failed to connect: dial tcp 127.0.0.1:2655: connectex: No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it. That makes sense as the podman VM was not running. Let’s check the VM: >podman machine list NAME         ...

Cache stampede: when our cache turned against us

While investigating some performance issues, we ran into an ASP.NET Core API that cached a fairly expensive aggregation query for 60 seconds. Under normal load, that was fine: one request rebuilds the cache, everyone else reads from it. Under peak load, dozens of requests would arrive in that same expiry window, all see a cache miss, and all fire the same expensive query in parallel. The database didn't like that. That was the moment when our caching layer stopped helping and started hurting. A burst of requests comes in at the same time, all miss the cache, and all go hammer the database or the downstream API at once. That's a cache stampede . The cache was supposed to protect our backend, and for a few hundred milliseconds it did the opposite. Why this happens IMemoryCache.GetOrCreate (and its async sibling) looks like it protects you, but it doesn't add any locking on its own. Look at the naive version: public async Task<Report> GetReportAsync(string key) ...

A complex system designed from scratch never works

A few years ago, I worked as an architect on a big mainframe rewrite. I still count it as one of my failures. Not because the technology was wrong, but because I couldn't convince the management team to simplify the approach. Years later, the organization is still struggling to get the new system up and running. I left the project at the time, because I couldn't put my name behind an approach that would take very long and cost a lot of money without a working system to show for it along the way. Gall’s Law That memory keeps coming back to me, because it's a textbook case of Gall's Law playing out in real life. Gall's Law , from John Gall's Systemantics , states it plainly: A complex system that works is invariably found to have evolved from a simple system that worked. A complex system designed from scratch never works, and it cannot be patched to make it work. You have to start over with a simple system that works. What does that mean in practice,...